Quantifying Data-Driven Campaigning Across Sponsors and Platforms

Although modern data-driven campaigning (DDC) is not entirely new, scholars have typically relied on reports and interviews of practitioners to understand its use. However, the advent of public ad libraries from Meta and Google provides an opportunity to measure the scope and variation in DDC practice in advertising across different types of sponsors and within sponsors across platforms. Using textual and audiovisual processing, we create a database of ads from the 2022 US elections. These data allow us to create an index that quantifies the extent of DDC at the level of the sponsor and platform. This index takes into account both the number of unique creatives placed and the similarity across those creatives. In addition, we explore the impact of sponsor resources, the office being sought, and the competitiveness of the race on the measure of DDC sophistication. Ultimately, our research establishes a measurement strategy for DDC that can be applied across ad sponsors, campaigns, parties, and even countries. Understanding the extent of DDC is vital for policy discussions surrounding the regulation of microtargeting and data privacy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Media and Communication
Published
2024-10-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.8577
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Social Media and Politics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.91

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Quantifying Data-Driven Campaigning Across Sponsors and Platforms

Michael M. Franz, Pavel Oleinikov, Erika Franklin Fowler, Travis N. Ridout et al.
2 citations
Media and Communication
Social Media and Politics
1.91
article

Quantifying Data-Driven Campaigning Across Sponsors and Platforms

Michael M. Franz, Pavel Oleinikov, Erika Franklin Fowler, Travis N. Ridout, Jielu Yao, Furkan Cakmak, Meiqing Zhang
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Although modern data-driven campaigning (DDC) is not entirely new, scholars have typically relied on reports and interviews of practitioners to understand its use. However, the advent of public ad libraries from Meta and Google provides an opportunity to measure the scope and variation in DDC practice in advertising across different types of sponsors and within sponsors across platforms. Using textual and audiovisual processing, we create a database of ads from the 2022 US elections. These data allow us to create an index that quantifies the extent of DDC at the level of the sponsor and platform. This index takes into account both the number of unique creatives placed and the similarity across those creatives. In addition, we explore the impact of sponsor resources, the office being sought, and the competitiveness of the race on the measure of DDC sophistication. Ultimately, our research establishes a measurement strategy for DDC that can be applied across ad sponsors, campaigns, parties, and even countries. Understanding the extent of DDC is vital for policy discussions surrounding the regulation of microtargeting and data privacy.

Media and CommunicationVol. 12
Wesleyan University (US), Bowdoin College (US), Texas Wesleyan University (US), National University of Singapore (SG), Washington State University (US)
National Science Foundation
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Social Media and Politics
1.91
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Quantifying Data-Driven Campaigning Across Sponsors and Platforms — Michael M. Franz, Pavel Oleinikov, et al. · Media and Communication (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS