Frames of consumer mobilization and modern slavery

This research offers insights into the contradictions of how anti-slavery Non-Government Organizations (NGOs) deploy the frames of responsible buyer and responsible citizen to mobilize consumers against modern slavery. The study examines the underlying assumptions and contradictions of the frames by drawing on framing theory and Judith Butler’s approach to “framing the frames”. Such an approach helps understand how NGOs obfuscate the responsibility of corporations in contributing to modern slavery. This research adds to extant interpretation of consumer activism by pointing to how consumer mobilization can be more usefully explained as a contested terrain that is shaped by activist groups whose communication is characterized by contradictions and conflicts. It also broadens the scope of framing theory by foregrounding the ethics of communication frames.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Research in Marketing
Published
2024-10-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijresmar.2024.10.005
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Migration, Ethnicity, and Economy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.13
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Frames of consumer mobilization and modern slavery

Deirdre Shaw, Michal Carrington, Rohit Varman, Andreas Chatzidakis
1 citations
International Journal of Research in Marketing
Migration, Ethnicity, and Economy
1.13
article

Frames of consumer mobilization and modern slavery

Deirdre Shaw, Michal Carrington, Rohit Varman, Andreas Chatzidakis
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This research offers insights into the contradictions of how anti-slavery Non-Government Organizations (NGOs) deploy the frames of responsible buyer and responsible citizen to mobilize consumers against modern slavery. The study examines the underlying assumptions and contradictions of the frames by drawing on framing theory and Judith Butler’s approach to “framing the frames”. Such an approach helps understand how NGOs obfuscate the responsibility of corporations in contributing to modern slavery. This research adds to extant interpretation of consumer activism by pointing to how consumer mobilization can be more usefully explained as a contested terrain that is shaped by activist groups whose communication is characterized by contradictions and conflicts. It also broadens the scope of framing theory by foregrounding the ethics of communication frames.

International Journal of Research in MarketingVol. 42(3)
The University of Melbourne (AU), Royal Holloway University of London (GB), Adam Smith Institute (GB), University of Birmingham (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Migration, Ethnicity, and Economy
1.13
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Frames of consumer mobilization and modern slavery — Deirdre Shaw, Michal Carrington, et al. · International Journal of Research in Marketing (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS