“Politics and the Pulpit are Terms that Have Little Agreement”: Edmund Burke’s Critique of the Political Theologian

Burke was possibly the first person to use the term “political theologian” in English. He used it as a term of opprobrium against dissenting preacher Richard Price and his enthusiasm for the French Revolution. This article seeks to explicate the meaning of the term “political theologians” in Burke’s Reflections, and why Burke regarded the conjunction of politics and theology as a pejorative. The article further seeks to explain how Burke could see such an integral and positive role for Christianity in relation to the English state, while using the term “political theologian” as a slur. It concludes that it was partisan politics in the pulpit that Burke opposed, something he regarded as a violation of the distinct characters and functions of politics and church in society. Finally, the article seeks to locate Burke within the genealogy of the terms “political theology” and “political theologian.”.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Political Theology
Published
2024-10-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/1462317x.2024.2417323
Primary Topic
American Constitutional Law and Politics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

“Politics and the Pulpit are Terms that Have Little Agreement”: Edmund Burke’s Critique of the Political Theologian

Jonathan Cole
Political Theology
American Constitutional Law and Politics
article

“Politics and the Pulpit are Terms that Have Little Agreement”: Edmund Burke’s Critique of the Political Theologian

Jonathan Cole
article en

Abstract

Burke was possibly the first person to use the term “political theologian” in English. He used it as a term of opprobrium against dissenting preacher Richard Price and his enthusiasm for the French Revolution. This article seeks to explicate the meaning of the term “political theologians” in Burke’s Reflections, and why Burke regarded the conjunction of politics and theology as a pejorative. The article further seeks to explain how Burke could see such an integral and positive role for Christianity in relation to the English state, while using the term “political theologian” as a slur. It concludes that it was partisan politics in the pulpit that Burke opposed, something he regarded as a violation of the distinct characters and functions of politics and church in society. Finally, the article seeks to locate Burke within the genealogy of the terms “political theology” and “political theologian.”.

Political TheologyVol. 26(4)
Charles Sturt University (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 70%
American Constitutional Law and Politics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

“Politics and the Pulpit are Terms that Have Little Agreement”: Edmund Burke’s Critique of the Political Theologian — Jonathan Cole · Political Theology (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS