Comparative Analysis of Parallel Prefix Adders

The speed, size, and power consumption of adders are always trade-offs that affect the system’s overall performance. One of the performance issues is carry propagation, which restricts the speed of the addition process. When it comes to latency and coverage area, Parallel Prefix Adders (PPAs) are the greatest adders on the market right now. The implementation and comparison of four widely used parallel adders—the Brent-Kung Adder, the Kogge-Stone Adder, the J Sklansky Adder, and the Ladner-Fischer Adder—are covered in this paper, The adders obtained delays are 5.910 ns, 4.580 ns, 4.148 ns, and 4.520 ns, respectively, and their corresponding power outputs are 15.196uW, 20.532uW, 17.864uW, and 11.240uW. In this research, the adders power consumption and delays have been compared. It’s discovered that no single adder can provide benefits for Power and Delay performance characteristics. Different adders are preferred for specific aspects; therefore, they are chosen based on design requirements.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-08-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/iacis61494.2024.10721962
Citations
21
Primary Topic
Algorithms and Data Compression
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.78
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative Analysis of Parallel Prefix Adders

Sarfraz Hussain, Abhilash Abhilash
21 citations
Algorithms and Data Compression
2.78
article

Comparative Analysis of Parallel Prefix Adders

Sarfraz Hussain, Abhilash Abhilash
article en
21 citations

Abstract

The speed, size, and power consumption of adders are always trade-offs that affect the system’s overall performance. One of the performance issues is carry propagation, which restricts the speed of the addition process. When it comes to latency and coverage area, Parallel Prefix Adders (PPAs) are the greatest adders on the market right now. The implementation and comparison of four widely used parallel adders—the Brent-Kung Adder, the Kogge-Stone Adder, the J Sklansky Adder, and the Ladner-Fischer Adder—are covered in this paper, The adders obtained delays are 5.910 ns, 4.580 ns, 4.148 ns, and 4.520 ns, respectively, and their corresponding power outputs are 15.196uW, 20.532uW, 17.864uW, and 11.240uW. In this research, the adders power consumption and delays have been compared. It’s discovered that no single adder can provide benefits for Power and Delay performance characteristics. Different adders are preferred for specific aspects; therefore, they are chosen based on design requirements.

REVA University (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Algorithms and Data Compression
2.78
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.