Environmental tradeoff on integrated carbon capture and in-situ methanation technology

Compared to conventional CO 2 removal methods, carbon capture and in-situ conversion using dual function materials avoid compression and transportation of CO 2 , which is regarded as a promising technology. Although it brings additional economic benefits, the environmental impacts of CO 2 capture and conversion remain unclear. A life cycle assessment of an integrated CO 2 capture and methanation system using dual function materials is conducted to investigate its feasibility to reduce global warming. Life cycle inventory is obtained through construction, operation, and disposal process of the integrated system . A dynamic model of CO 2 capture and methanation is developed to obtain the operating parameters. Results show that the optimal global warming potential is 0.706 kg CO 2,eq per kilogram captured CO 2 , which indicates the advantages of using dual function materials for carbon mitigation. Global warming potential is a minor factor among the overall normalized environmental impacts, only accounting for 0.5 % of the total normalized impact, while the main factor marine aquatic ecotoxicity accounts for around 73 %, and fresh water aquatic ecotoxicity accounts for around 23 %. Global warming potential is the most affected by green hydrogen input, followed by dual function material input. Results reveal that the integrated CO 2 capture and conversion using dual function materials is conducive to carbon mitigation but has significant other environmental impacts, such as marine aquatic ecotoxicity, and the main contributors to the environmental impacts are wind electricity, green hydrogen, refrigerator, and dual function material. • Life cycle assessment is conducted for integrated CO 2 capture and in-situ methanation. • The effects of operating parameters on environmental impacts are evaluated. • At least 0.706 kg CO 2 equivalent emission per kilogram captured CO 2 is obtained. • The main environmental impact is marine and fresh water aquatic ecotoxicity. • Wind electricity and green hydrogen are main contributors to the environment impacts.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews
Published
2024-10-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2024.115029
Citations
7
Primary Topic
Carbon Dioxide Capture Technologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.49

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Environmental tradeoff on integrated carbon capture and in-situ methanation technology

Chaoqun Wu, Yuqi Huang, Wenwu Liu, Xueqiao Zhang et al.
7 citations
Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews
Carbon Dioxide Capture Technologies
1.49
article

Environmental tradeoff on integrated carbon capture and in-situ methanation technology

Chaoqun Wu, Yuqi Huang, Wenwu Liu, Xueqiao Zhang, Jiang Yong, Long Jiang
article en
7 citations

Abstract

Compared to conventional CO 2 removal methods, carbon capture and in-situ conversion using dual function materials avoid compression and transportation of CO 2 , which is regarded as a promising technology. Although it brings additional economic benefits, the environmental impacts of CO 2 capture and conversion remain unclear. A life cycle assessment of an integrated CO 2 capture and methanation system using dual function materials is conducted to investigate its feasibility to reduce global warming. Life cycle inventory is obtained through construction, operation, and disposal process of the integrated system . A dynamic model of CO 2 capture and methanation is developed to obtain the operating parameters. Results show that the optimal global warming potential is 0.706 kg CO 2,eq per kilogram captured CO 2 , which indicates the advantages of using dual function materials for carbon mitigation. Global warming potential is a minor factor among the overall normalized environmental impacts, only accounting for 0.5 % of the total normalized impact, while the main factor marine aquatic ecotoxicity accounts for around 73 %, and fresh water aquatic ecotoxicity accounts for around 23 %. Global warming potential is the most affected by green hydrogen input, followed by dual function material input. Results reveal that the integrated CO 2 capture and conversion using dual function materials is conducive to carbon mitigation but has significant other environmental impacts, such as marine aquatic ecotoxicity, and the main contributors to the environmental impacts are wind electricity, green hydrogen, refrigerator, and dual function material. • Life cycle assessment is conducted for integrated CO 2 capture and in-situ methanation. • The effects of operating parameters on environmental impacts are evaluated. • At least 0.706 kg CO 2 equivalent emission per kilogram captured CO 2 is obtained. • The main environmental impact is marine and fresh water aquatic ecotoxicity. • Wind electricity and green hydrogen are main contributors to the environment impacts.

Renewable and Sustainable Energy ReviewsVol. 208
Queen's University Belfast (GB), Zhejiang University (CN)
Innovative Research Group Project of the National Natural Science Foundation of China
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
Carbon Dioxide Capture Technologies
1.49
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.