0.2-mm-Step Verification of the Dual Gaussian Distribution Model with Large Sample Size for Predicting Tap Success Rates

The Dual Gaussian Distribution Model can be utilized for predicting the success rates of tapping targets. However, previous studies have shown that the prediction error increases to as much as 10 points, where "points" represent the percentage difference between the observed and predicted values of the tap success rate, particularly for a small target width W such as 2 mm. We hypothesize that this could be due to the experimental designs with sparse W levels performed by few participants, rather than the model itself. Our experiment involving horizontal and vertical bar targets with W = 2-8 mm (step: 0.2 mm) performed by more than 180 participants showed that the maximum prediction errors were relatively small: 2.769 and 3.185 points, respectively. Furthermore, the correlation between W and the prediction error was statistically small (Pearson's |r| < 0.2), and W was not a significant contributor to changing prediction errors (p>0.05). As these results do not support the concerns that the Dual Gaussian Distribution Model has an issue when used with small targets, the development of applications and refined models is encouraged to continue.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction
Published
2024-10-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1145/3698153
Primary Topic
Interactive and Immersive Displays
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

0.2-mm-Step Verification of the Dual Gaussian Distribution Model with Large Sample Size for Predicting Tap Success Rates

Shota Yamanaka, Hiroki Usuba
Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction
Interactive and Immersive Displays
article

0.2-mm-Step Verification of the Dual Gaussian Distribution Model with Large Sample Size for Predicting Tap Success Rates

Shota Yamanaka, Hiroki Usuba
article en

Abstract

The Dual Gaussian Distribution Model can be utilized for predicting the success rates of tapping targets. However, previous studies have shown that the prediction error increases to as much as 10 points, where "points" represent the percentage difference between the observed and predicted values of the tap success rate, particularly for a small target width W such as 2 mm. We hypothesize that this could be due to the experimental designs with sparse W levels performed by few participants, rather than the model itself. Our experiment involving horizontal and vertical bar targets with W = 2-8 mm (step: 0.2 mm) performed by more than 180 participants showed that the maximum prediction errors were relatively small: 2.769 and 3.185 points, respectively. Furthermore, the correlation between W and the prediction error was statistically small (Pearson's |r| < 0.2), and W was not a significant contributor to changing prediction errors (p>0.05). As these results do not support the concerns that the Dual Gaussian Distribution Model has an issue when used with small targets, the development of applications and refined models is encouraged to continue.

Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer InteractionVol. 8(ISS)
Openalex Percentile: Top 81%
Interactive and Immersive Displays
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.