“Magnifying God Manyfolde”: James Ryman’s Practice of Repetition

This article examines the poems of James Ryman (fl. 1492), a Franciscan friar at Canterbury. With reference to their mise-en-page in the sole surviving manuscript, the partial holograph Cambridge, University Library, MS Ee.1.12, it focuses on Ryman’s habit of repeating both scriptural and liturgical quotations and word blocks of his own composition across multiple poems, arguing that such repetitions are not failures of technical skill but traces of his writing process. First, it contrasts Ryman’s repetitions with those of a number of his contemporaries, positing that his have been experienced as problematic because they do not necessarily respond to attempts to link form with content. Second, by demonstrating how he builds on established mnemonic techniques, it shows that his repeated words and phrases serve as mental building blocks which not only facilitate composition but constitute his subject matter. It thus sets out a new way of reading Ryman, with a focus on praxis rather than product; finally, it considers what such an approach contributes to recent debates around the critical usefulness of “lyric” as a genre.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Modern Philology
Published
2024-10-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1086/732761
Primary Topic
Theatre and Performance Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

“Magnifying God Manyfolde”: James Ryman’s Practice of Repetition

Jane Griffiths
Modern Philology
Theatre and Performance Studies
article

“Magnifying God Manyfolde”: James Ryman’s Practice of Repetition

Jane Griffiths
article en

Abstract

This article examines the poems of James Ryman (fl. 1492), a Franciscan friar at Canterbury. With reference to their mise-en-page in the sole surviving manuscript, the partial holograph Cambridge, University Library, MS Ee.1.12, it focuses on Ryman’s habit of repeating both scriptural and liturgical quotations and word blocks of his own composition across multiple poems, arguing that such repetitions are not failures of technical skill but traces of his writing process. First, it contrasts Ryman’s repetitions with those of a number of his contemporaries, positing that his have been experienced as problematic because they do not necessarily respond to attempts to link form with content. Second, by demonstrating how he builds on established mnemonic techniques, it shows that his repeated words and phrases serve as mental building blocks which not only facilitate composition but constitute his subject matter. It thus sets out a new way of reading Ryman, with a focus on praxis rather than product; finally, it considers what such an approach contributes to recent debates around the critical usefulness of “lyric” as a genre.

Modern PhilologyVol. 122(2)
University of Oxford (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 72%
Theatre and Performance Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

“Magnifying God Manyfolde”: James Ryman’s Practice of Repetition — Jane Griffiths · Modern Philology (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS