How care infrastructures support distance and connection in community welfare organisations: Learning from COVID-19 lockdowns

The coronavirus pandemic forced local support services in marginalised communities to adapt how they operated at the same time as demand for assistance soared. Social distancing restrictions brought into sharp relief the infrastructural dimensions of social care and support services and networks that are often backgrounded in day-to-day practice. A shadow care infrastructures lens looks purposively at care infrastructures that are not readily seen or acknowledged in dominant welfare discourse and research (Power, Wiesel, Mitchell, & Mee, 2022). Taking this analytic lens as our starting point, in this paper we explore how relations of care were reconfigured by the shift to remote care delivery during Covid-19 lockdowns and beyond. The challenges of providing care during lockdown reveal the complex interplay between distance and proximity in care relations and practices and the possibilities for doing care differently. The paper draws primarily on in-depth interviews with paid and voluntary supporters across a diverse range of care organisations servicing two Local Government Areas (LGAs) in Central Western Sydney. A gateway region for new migrants west of the population centre of Sydney, it was one of the areas worst affected by the outbreak of the Delta variant of Covid-19 in 2021. The paper reflects on the potential longevity of pandemic care practices as cities learn to live with Covid. • Covid-19 shifted relations of distance and proximity on the 'frontline' of community-based service delivery. • The reconfiguration of care infrastructures during lockdowns modified the tracks on which community-based care runs. • Remote and digitally mediated forms of care blurred established spatial and professional boundaries of 'home' and 'work'. • Ad hoc and rapid reworking of infrastructures may lead to unintended and lasting changes in post-Covid welfare services.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cities
Published
2024-10-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2024.105453
Citations
7
Primary Topic
Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.95

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

How care infrastructures support distance and connection in community welfare organisations: Learning from COVID-19 lockdowns

Emma Mitchell, Emma Power, Ilan Wiesel, Kathleen Mee
7 citations
Cities
Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes
5.95
article

How care infrastructures support distance and connection in community welfare organisations: Learning from COVID-19 lockdowns

Emma Mitchell, Emma Power, Ilan Wiesel, Kathleen Mee
article en
7 citations

Abstract

The coronavirus pandemic forced local support services in marginalised communities to adapt how they operated at the same time as demand for assistance soared. Social distancing restrictions brought into sharp relief the infrastructural dimensions of social care and support services and networks that are often backgrounded in day-to-day practice. A shadow care infrastructures lens looks purposively at care infrastructures that are not readily seen or acknowledged in dominant welfare discourse and research (Power, Wiesel, Mitchell, & Mee, 2022). Taking this analytic lens as our starting point, in this paper we explore how relations of care were reconfigured by the shift to remote care delivery during Covid-19 lockdowns and beyond. The challenges of providing care during lockdown reveal the complex interplay between distance and proximity in care relations and practices and the possibilities for doing care differently. The paper draws primarily on in-depth interviews with paid and voluntary supporters across a diverse range of care organisations servicing two Local Government Areas (LGAs) in Central Western Sydney. A gateway region for new migrants west of the population centre of Sydney, it was one of the areas worst affected by the outbreak of the Delta variant of Covid-19 in 2021. The paper reflects on the potential longevity of pandemic care practices as cities learn to live with Covid. • Covid-19 shifted relations of distance and proximity on the 'frontline' of community-based service delivery. • The reconfiguration of care infrastructures during lockdowns modified the tracks on which community-based care runs. • Remote and digitally mediated forms of care blurred established spatial and professional boundaries of 'home' and 'work'. • Ad hoc and rapid reworking of infrastructures may lead to unintended and lasting changes in post-Covid welfare services.

CitiesVol. 156
The University of Melbourne (AU), Western Sydney University (AU), University of Newcastle Australia (AU), Macquarie University (AU)
Australian Research Council
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes
5.95
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.