Assessing the ex-ante impacts of a low-emission zone on transport poverty and vulnerability with the VulMob indicator

• The Vulmob indicator is suited for assessing the impact of LEZs on vulnerabilities. • The impact of a LEZ on vulnerable households in Grenoble, France is studied. • Vulnerable households would be more affected by the LEZ than non-vulnerable ones. • Vulnerable households are more likely to remain without an adaptation solution. • Modal shift (active modes and public transport) has a great adaptation potential. Numerous Low Emission Zones (LEZs) have been implemented across Europe to improve air quality and reduce car use. However, to date, the impact of LEZs has been widely perceived as regressive, since vehicles that meet the low emission requirements are more expensive than others. The literature assessing the impact of LEZs on vulnerable and poor households prior to their implementation is sparse, particularly if we take into account the diversity of households’ capacities to adapt according to their characteristics and mobility habits, beyond the sole solution of purchasing a LEZ-compatible vehicle. However, such assessments would make it possible to define accompanying policies to improve the social justice of the LEZs. In this article, we develop a methodology to evaluate the ex-ante impacts of a LEZ on vulnerable or poor households. First, we identify households affected by the LEZ. Second, the VulMob multidimensional indicator is used to identify, among affected households, households with low transport-affordability and highly vulnerable households according to their vulnerability profiles. Third, we assess the adaptive capacity in terms of modal shift options and considering the possibility to modify the destination. We apply this methodology to the Grenoble area (France), using the Local Household Travel Survey. The results show that not only are highly vulnerable households more affected by the LEZ than other households, but also that more of them are left with no alternative but to buy a LEZ-compliant car. Nevertheless, modal shift seems an adaptation solution with great potential for all households. This could improve the environmental and health performance of LEZs. This work can guide decision-makers in the definition of preventive and compensatory policies, considering the profiles of transport vulnerability and the specificities of the territory.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Case Studies on Transport Policy
Published
2024-10-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cstp.2024.101308
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Urban Transport and Accessibility
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.73

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessing the ex-ante impacts of a low-emission zone on transport poverty and vulnerability with the VulMob indicator

Lola Blandin, Sandrine Mathy, Hélène Bouscasse
4 citations
Case Studies on Transport Policy
Urban Transport and Accessibility
2.73
article

Assessing the ex-ante impacts of a low-emission zone on transport poverty and vulnerability with the VulMob indicator

Lola Blandin, Sandrine Mathy, Hélène Bouscasse
article en
4 citations

Abstract

• The Vulmob indicator is suited for assessing the impact of LEZs on vulnerabilities. • The impact of a LEZ on vulnerable households in Grenoble, France is studied. • Vulnerable households would be more affected by the LEZ than non-vulnerable ones. • Vulnerable households are more likely to remain without an adaptation solution. • Modal shift (active modes and public transport) has a great adaptation potential. Numerous Low Emission Zones (LEZs) have been implemented across Europe to improve air quality and reduce car use. However, to date, the impact of LEZs has been widely perceived as regressive, since vehicles that meet the low emission requirements are more expensive than others. The literature assessing the impact of LEZs on vulnerable and poor households prior to their implementation is sparse, particularly if we take into account the diversity of households’ capacities to adapt according to their characteristics and mobility habits, beyond the sole solution of purchasing a LEZ-compatible vehicle. However, such assessments would make it possible to define accompanying policies to improve the social justice of the LEZs. In this article, we develop a methodology to evaluate the ex-ante impacts of a LEZ on vulnerable or poor households. First, we identify households affected by the LEZ. Second, the VulMob multidimensional indicator is used to identify, among affected households, households with low transport-affordability and highly vulnerable households according to their vulnerability profiles. Third, we assess the adaptive capacity in terms of modal shift options and considering the possibility to modify the destination. We apply this methodology to the Grenoble area (France), using the Local Household Travel Survey. The results show that not only are highly vulnerable households more affected by the LEZ than other households, but also that more of them are left with no alternative but to buy a LEZ-compliant car. Nevertheless, modal shift seems an adaptation solution with great potential for all households. This could improve the environmental and health performance of LEZs. This work can guide decision-makers in the definition of preventive and compensatory policies, considering the profiles of transport vulnerability and the specificities of the territory.

Case Studies on Transport PolicyVol. 19
Institut polytechnique de Grenoble (FR), Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR), Institut National de Recherche pour l'Agriculture, l'Alimentation et l'Environnement (FR), Laboratoire d'Economie Appliquée de Grenoble (FR), Centre d'économie et de sociologie appliquées à l'agriculture et aux espaces ruraux (FR), Institut Agro Dijon (FR), Université Grenoble Alpes (FR)
Agence Nationale de la Recherche
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Urban Transport and Accessibility
2.73
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.