Cable dimension determination using Finite Element Method Magnetic (FEMM) for three-core belted and gas insulated cables

• A numerical method using Finite Element Method (FEM) based Freeware Finite Element Method Magnetic (FEMM) is used to determine the optimal insulation thickness and diameter (‘T/d’) for a three-core belted cable, enclosed by a grounded sheath, as well as for a gas-insulated cable (GIC) with a common enclosure • Analogs to single-core coaxial cable, for a three-core belted cable with a radius of 1 per unit (p.u.), the best ‘T/d’ ratio is 0.80 when subjected to a 1 p.u. Peak potential. • The best conductor radius and conductor-to-cable center dimension for common-enclosure gas-insulated cables are verified to be 0.18 and 0.5, respectively • These reported results were obtained numerically using the FEM-based freeware FEMM model for the first time as no analytical solution is available in these cases. • FEMM provides low computational cost and reliable results compared to commercial software. A numerical approach utilizing the Finite Element Method (FEM) based freeware Finite Element Method Magnetic (FEMM) is employed to optimize the insulation thickness to diameter ratio (‘T/d’) for a three-core belted cable, enclosed by a grounded sheath, as well as for a gas-insulated cable (GIC) with a common enclosure. The method analyzes the maximum electric field (E-field) within the cable. The minimum E-field magnitude across three critical regions where the E-field at its peak is calculated for different ‘T/d’ ratios, and the optimal ‘T/d’ is identified by selecting the maximum of these minimum values. Analogs to single-core coaxial cable, for a three-core belted cable with a radius of 1 per unit (p.u.), the best ‘T/d’ ratio is 0.80 when subjected to a 1 p.u. Peak potential. Additionally, the optimal conductor radius and conductor-to-cable center dimension for common-enclosure gas-insulated cables are verified to be 0.18 and 0.5, respectively. This study provides a first-time investigation of the best ‘T/d’ ratio for three-core belted cables and verifies CGIC cable parameters using FEMM, where no analytical solutions are available. The results are validated by comparing FEMM with analytical and Charge Simulation Method (CSM) outcomes. Hence, the FEMM provides low computational cost and reliable results compared to commercial software. Through these simulation efforts, the study re-examines the stress within the belted and gas-insulated cables and the parameters that influence it. The FEMM method allows for precise control of both conductor and sheath potentials, ensuring no potential discrepancies between the applied and calculated values across the entire range of T/d ratios.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
e-Prime - Advances in Electrical Engineering Electronics and Energy
Published
2024-10-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prime.2024.100826
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Thermal Analysis in Power Transmission
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.31
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Cable dimension determination using Finite Element Method Magnetic (FEMM) for three-core belted and gas insulated cables

Mohit Bajaj, Milkias Berhanu Tuka, Gururaj S. Punekar, Tesfaye Nafo Tefera et al.
4 citations
e-Prime - Advances in Electrical Engineering Electronics and Energy
Thermal Analysis in Power Transmission
1.31
article

Cable dimension determination using Finite Element Method Magnetic (FEMM) for three-core belted and gas insulated cables

Mohit Bajaj, Milkias Berhanu Tuka, Gururaj S. Punekar, Tesfaye Nafo Tefera, kemal Ibrahim
article en
4 citations

Abstract

• A numerical method using Finite Element Method (FEM) based Freeware Finite Element Method Magnetic (FEMM) is used to determine the optimal insulation thickness and diameter (‘T/d’) for a three-core belted cable, enclosed by a grounded sheath, as well as for a gas-insulated cable (GIC) with a common enclosure • Analogs to single-core coaxial cable, for a three-core belted cable with a radius of 1 per unit (p.u.), the best ‘T/d’ ratio is 0.80 when subjected to a 1 p.u. Peak potential. • The best conductor radius and conductor-to-cable center dimension for common-enclosure gas-insulated cables are verified to be 0.18 and 0.5, respectively • These reported results were obtained numerically using the FEM-based freeware FEMM model for the first time as no analytical solution is available in these cases. • FEMM provides low computational cost and reliable results compared to commercial software. A numerical approach utilizing the Finite Element Method (FEM) based freeware Finite Element Method Magnetic (FEMM) is employed to optimize the insulation thickness to diameter ratio (‘T/d’) for a three-core belted cable, enclosed by a grounded sheath, as well as for a gas-insulated cable (GIC) with a common enclosure. The method analyzes the maximum electric field (E-field) within the cable. The minimum E-field magnitude across three critical regions where the E-field at its peak is calculated for different ‘T/d’ ratios, and the optimal ‘T/d’ is identified by selecting the maximum of these minimum values. Analogs to single-core coaxial cable, for a three-core belted cable with a radius of 1 per unit (p.u.), the best ‘T/d’ ratio is 0.80 when subjected to a 1 p.u. Peak potential. Additionally, the optimal conductor radius and conductor-to-cable center dimension for common-enclosure gas-insulated cables are verified to be 0.18 and 0.5, respectively. This study provides a first-time investigation of the best ‘T/d’ ratio for three-core belted cables and verifies CGIC cable parameters using FEMM, where no analytical solutions are available. The results are validated by comparing FEMM with analytical and Charge Simulation Method (CSM) outcomes. Hence, the FEMM provides low computational cost and reliable results compared to commercial software. Through these simulation efforts, the study re-examines the stress within the belted and gas-insulated cables and the parameters that influence it. The FEMM method allows for precise control of both conductor and sheath potentials, ensuring no potential discrepancies between the applied and calculated values across the entire range of T/d ratios.

e-Prime - Advances in Electrical Engineering Electronics and EnergyVol. 10
Al-Ahliyya Amman University (JO), National Institute of Technology Karnataka (IN), Addis Ababa Science and Technology University (ET), University of Business and Technology (SA), Graphic Era University (IN)
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Thermal Analysis in Power Transmission
1.31
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.