A comparative analysis of unsupervised machine‐learning methods in <scp>PSG</scp>‐related phenotyping

Obstructive sleep apnea is a heterogeneous sleep disorder with varying phenotypes. Several studies have already performed cluster analyses to discover various obstructive sleep apnea phenotypic clusters. However, the selection of the clustering method might affect the outputs. Consequently, it is unclear whether similar obstructive sleep apnea clusters can be reproduced using different clustering methods. In this study, we applied four well-known clustering methods: Agglomerative Hierarchical Clustering; K-means; Fuzzy C-means; and Gaussian Mixture Model to a population of 865 suspected obstructive sleep apnea patients. By creating five clusters with each method, we examined the effect of clustering methods on forming obstructive sleep apnea clusters and the differences in their physiological characteristics. We utilized a visualization technique to indicate the cluster formations, Cohen's kappa statistics to find the similarity and agreement between clustering methods, and performance evaluation to compare the clustering performance. As a result, two out of five clusters were distinctly different with all four methods, while three other clusters exhibited overlapping features across all methods. In terms of agreement, Fuzzy C-means and K-means had the strongest (κ = 0.87), and Agglomerative hierarchical clustering and Gaussian Mixture Model had the weakest agreement (κ = 0.51) between each other. The K-means showed the best clustering performance, followed by the Fuzzy C-means in most evaluation criteria. Moreover, Fuzzy C-means showed the greatest potential in handling overlapping clusters compared with other methods. In conclusion, we revealed a direct impact of clustering method selection on the formation and physiological characteristics of obstructive sleep apnea clusters. In addition, we highlighted the capability of soft clustering methods, particularly Fuzzy C-means, in the application of obstructive sleep apnea phenotyping.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Sleep Research
Published
2024-10-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/jsr.14349
Citations
6
Primary Topic
Obstructive Sleep Apnea Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.96

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A comparative analysis of unsupervised machine‐learning methods in PSG‐related phenotyping

Salla Hietakoste, Sami Nikkonen, Luka Biedebach, Tuomas Karhu et al.
6 citations
Journal of Sleep Research
Obstructive Sleep Apnea Research
1.96
article

A comparative analysis of unsupervised machine‐learning methods in PSG‐related phenotyping

Salla Hietakoste, Sami Nikkonen, Luka Biedebach, Tuomas Karhu, Daniela Ferreira‐Santos, Mohammadreza Ghorvei, Matias Rusanen, Anna Sigríður Íslind, Harald Hrubos‐Strøm, Timo Leppänen
article en
6 citations

Abstract

Obstructive sleep apnea is a heterogeneous sleep disorder with varying phenotypes. Several studies have already performed cluster analyses to discover various obstructive sleep apnea phenotypic clusters. However, the selection of the clustering method might affect the outputs. Consequently, it is unclear whether similar obstructive sleep apnea clusters can be reproduced using different clustering methods. In this study, we applied four well-known clustering methods: Agglomerative Hierarchical Clustering; K-means; Fuzzy C-means; and Gaussian Mixture Model to a population of 865 suspected obstructive sleep apnea patients. By creating five clusters with each method, we examined the effect of clustering methods on forming obstructive sleep apnea clusters and the differences in their physiological characteristics. We utilized a visualization technique to indicate the cluster formations, Cohen's kappa statistics to find the similarity and agreement between clustering methods, and performance evaluation to compare the clustering performance. As a result, two out of five clusters were distinctly different with all four methods, while three other clusters exhibited overlapping features across all methods. In terms of agreement, Fuzzy C-means and K-means had the strongest (κ = 0.87), and Agglomerative hierarchical clustering and Gaussian Mixture Model had the weakest agreement (κ = 0.51) between each other. The K-means showed the best clustering performance, followed by the Fuzzy C-means in most evaluation criteria. Moreover, Fuzzy C-means showed the greatest potential in handling overlapping clusters compared with other methods. In conclusion, we revealed a direct impact of clustering method selection on the formation and physiological characteristics of obstructive sleep apnea clusters. In addition, we highlighted the capability of soft clustering methods, particularly Fuzzy C-means, in the application of obstructive sleep apnea phenotyping.

Journal of Sleep ResearchVol. 34(3)
Reykjavík University (IS), Inserm (FR), The University of Queensland (AU), University of Eastern Finland (FI), University of Oslo (NO), Akershus University Hospital (NO), Kuopio University Hospital (FI), INESC TEC (PT), Université Grenoble Alpes (FR)
European Commission, Agence Nationale de la Recherche, Kuopion Yliopistollinen Sairaala, Tampereen Tuberkuloosisäätiö, Orionin Tutkimussäätiö, Hengityssairauksien Tutkimussäätiö
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Obstructive Sleep Apnea Research
1.96
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.