Evolution of H α equivalent widths from z ∼ 0.4 - 2.2: implications for star formation and legacy surveys with <i>Roman</i> and <i>Euclid</i>

ABSTRACT Past studies have investigated the evolution in specific star formation rate (sSFR) and its observational proxy (H $\alpha$ equivalent width; EW) up to $z \sim 6$; however, such measurements may overestimate the typical sSFR/EW at a given redshift due to selection effects. We investigate the ‘intrinsic’ (selection and observational effects corrected) H $\alpha$ EW distributions of $z \sim 0.4 - 2.2$ narrowband-selected H $\alpha$ samples from High-z Emission Line Survey (HiZELS) and Deep and Wide Narrowband survey (DAWN) using a forward modelling approach where we assume an ‘intrinsic’ exponential EW distribution, apply selection and filter effects, and compare with observed H $\alpha$ EW distributions. We find an ‘intrinsic’ EW–stellar mass anticorrelation, EW$_0 \propto M^\gamma$, with steepening slopes $\gamma = -0.18\pm 0.03$ to $-0.24^{+0.06}_{-0.08}$ at $z \sim 0.4$ and $z\sim 2.2$, respectively. At $10^{10}$ M$_\odot$, we find EW$_0 \propto (1+z)^{1.78^{+0.22}_{-0.23}}$ and a steeper evolution with decreasing stellar mass highlighting the high EW nature of low-mass, high-z systems. We model this redshift evolving EW–stellar mass anticorrelation, $W_0(M,z)$, and find it produces H $\alpha$luminosity and SFR functions strongly consistent with observations. Our $W_0(M,z)$ model suggests EW$_{\mathrm{0}}$$&amp;gt; 200$ Å emitters contribute $\sim 40$ per cent to overall cosmic SF at $z \sim 1.5 - 2$, consistent with sSFR $\gt 10^{-8.5}$ yr$^{-1}$ (makes up $\sim 45 - 55$ per cent of cosmic SF at $z \sim 2$) and highlights the importance of high EW systems at high-z. Our $W_0(M,z)$ model also reproduces the cosmic sSFR evolution found in both simulations and observations (including selection limits), such that selection effects in observations may explain the disagreement. Lastly, we forecast Roman and Euclid grism surveys using our $W_0(M,z)$ model including limiting resolution and observational efficiency effects. We predict $\sim 24\,000$ and $\sim 30\,000$$0.5 &amp;lt; z &amp;lt; 1.9$ H $\alpha$ emitters per deg$^{-2}$, respectively, down to $F_{\rm {H\alpha }+\rm {[N{{\small II}}]}} &amp;gt; 5\times 10^{-17}$ erg s$^{-1}$ cm$^{-2}$ including $10^{7.2 - 8}$ M$_\odot$ galaxies at $z &amp;gt; 1$ with EW$_{\mathrm{0}}$$&amp;gt; 1000$ Å. Both Roman and Euclid will observe some of the most bursty/high EW, low-mass star-forming galaxies near cosmic noon in unprecedented detail.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
Published
2024-10-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stae2395
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.33

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evolution of H α equivalent widths from z ∼ 0.4 - 2.2: implications for star formation and legacy surveys with Roman and Euclid

Ali Ahmad Khostovan, James E. Rhoads, Santosh Harish, Alicia Coughlin et al.
4 citations
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
1.33
article

Evolution of H α equivalent widths from z ∼ 0.4 - 2.2: implications for star formation and legacy surveys with Roman and Euclid

Ali Ahmad Khostovan, James E. Rhoads, Santosh Harish, Alicia Coughlin, Saeed Rezaee, Sangeeta Malhotra, Vithal Tilvi, David Sobral
article en
4 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT Past studies have investigated the evolution in specific star formation rate (sSFR) and its observational proxy (H $\alpha$ equivalent width; EW) up to $z \sim 6$; however, such measurements may overestimate the typical sSFR/EW at a given redshift due to selection effects. We investigate the ‘intrinsic’ (selection and observational effects corrected) H $\alpha$ EW distributions of $z \sim 0.4 - 2.2$ narrowband-selected H $\alpha$ samples from High-z Emission Line Survey (HiZELS) and Deep and Wide Narrowband survey (DAWN) using a forward modelling approach where we assume an ‘intrinsic’ exponential EW distribution, apply selection and filter effects, and compare with observed H $\alpha$ EW distributions. We find an ‘intrinsic’ EW–stellar mass anticorrelation, EW$_0 \propto M^\gamma$, with steepening slopes $\gamma = -0.18\pm 0.03$ to $-0.24^{+0.06}_{-0.08}$ at $z \sim 0.4$ and $z\sim 2.2$, respectively. At $10^{10}$ M$_\odot$, we find EW$_0 \propto (1+z)^{1.78^{+0.22}_{-0.23}}$ and a steeper evolution with decreasing stellar mass highlighting the high EW nature of low-mass, high-z systems. We model this redshift evolving EW–stellar mass anticorrelation, $W_0(M,z)$, and find it produces H $\alpha$luminosity and SFR functions strongly consistent with observations. Our $W_0(M,z)$ model suggests EW$_{\mathrm{0}}$$&amp;gt; 200$ Å emitters contribute $\sim 40$ per cent to overall cosmic SF at $z \sim 1.5 - 2$, consistent with sSFR $\gt 10^{-8.5}$ yr$^{-1}$ (makes up $\sim 45 - 55$ per cent of cosmic SF at $z \sim 2$) and highlights the importance of high EW systems at high-z. Our $W_0(M,z)$ model also reproduces the cosmic sSFR evolution found in both simulations and observations (including selection limits), such that selection effects in observations may explain the disagreement. Lastly, we forecast Roman and Euclid grism surveys using our $W_0(M,z)$ model including limiting resolution and observational efficiency effects. We predict $\sim 24\,000$ and $\sim 30\,000$$0.5 &amp;lt; z &amp;lt; 1.9$ H $\alpha$ emitters per deg$^{-2}$, respectively, down to $F_{\rm {H\alpha }+\rm {[N{{\small II}}]}} &amp;gt; 5\times 10^{-17}$ erg s$^{-1}$ cm$^{-2}$ including $10^{7.2 - 8}$ M$_\odot$ galaxies at $z &amp;gt; 1$ with EW$_{\mathrm{0}}$$&amp;gt; 1000$ Å. Both Roman and Euclid will observe some of the most bursty/high EW, low-mass star-forming galaxies near cosmic noon in unprecedented detail.

Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical SocietyVol. 535(4)
University of California, Riverside (US), Goddard Space Flight Center (US), Rochester Institute of Technology (US), Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare, Galileo Galilei Institute for Theoretical Physics (IT), Chandler–Gilbert Community College (US), Lancaster University (GB)
National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Universities Space Research Association
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
1.33
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.