The duty to listen

Abstract In philosophical work on the ethics of conversational exchange, much has been written regarding the speaker side—i.e., on the rights and duties we have as speakers. This paper explores the relatively neglected topic of the duties pertaining to the listeners’ side of the exchange. Following W.K. Clifford, we argue that it's fruitful to think of our epistemic resources as common property . Furthermore, listeners have a key role in maintaining and improving these resources, perhaps a more important role than speakers. We develop this idea by drawing from Hugo Mercier and Dan Sperber's “interactionist” picture of reason, which suggests that reasoning is essentially dialogical and relies on the epistemic vigilance of listeners. The paper defends an imperfect, prima facie duty to listen, one that is sufficiently strong to place substantial demands on individuals, but not so overly demanding as to be implausible.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Philosophy and Phenomenological Research
Published
2024-10-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/phpr.13119
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Rhetoric and Communication Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
12.65
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The duty to listen

Robin McKenna, Hrishikesh Joshi
3 citations
Philosophy and Phenomenological Research
Rhetoric and Communication Studies
12.65
article

The duty to listen

Robin McKenna, Hrishikesh Joshi
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Abstract In philosophical work on the ethics of conversational exchange, much has been written regarding the speaker side—i.e., on the rights and duties we have as speakers. This paper explores the relatively neglected topic of the duties pertaining to the listeners’ side of the exchange. Following W.K. Clifford, we argue that it's fruitful to think of our epistemic resources as common property . Furthermore, listeners have a key role in maintaining and improving these resources, perhaps a more important role than speakers. We develop this idea by drawing from Hugo Mercier and Dan Sperber's “interactionist” picture of reason, which suggests that reasoning is essentially dialogical and relies on the epistemic vigilance of listeners. The paper defends an imperfect, prima facie duty to listen, one that is sufficiently strong to place substantial demands on individuals, but not so overly demanding as to be implausible.

Philosophy and Phenomenological ResearchVol. 110(2)
University of Arizona (US), University of Liverpool (GB), University of Johannesburg (ZA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Rhetoric and Communication Studies
12.65
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The duty to listen — Robin McKenna, Hrishikesh Joshi · Philosophy and Phenomenological Research (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS