Modes of Relevance in Research: Towards Understanding the Promises and Possibilities of Doing Relevance

Abstract In response to growing social, ecological and health-related challenges, scientists are increasingly expected to demonstrate the societal relevance of their work. This special issue critically examines the concept of “relevance” in scientific research, exploring how it is defined, enacted and contested across disciplines, institutions and collaborations. We propose a practice-oriented conceptualization of “doing relevance”, understanding it not as an inherent property of knowledge, but as a situated achievement shaped by various practices. To this end, we introduce four distinct modes of relevance: 1) relevance as reorienting research topics and disciplines; 2) relevance as engaging societal actors in user-driven research; 3) relevance as reshaping interactions between science and policy; and 4) relevance as transforming academic institutions. The contributions to this issue analyze how these four modes are enacted through the practices of diverse actors, demonstrating that relevance is not a static or self-evident concept, but is continually redefined in situated and context-specific engagements. Together, the articles illustrate how researchers navigate diverse expectations and institutional demands, leading them to enact relevance through concrete practices instead of following pre-determined criteria. We conclude by calling for future research that further explores how relevance is continually reconfigured in response to specific challenges, and how these reconfigurations enable and constrain science’s capacity to address pressing societal needs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Minerva
Published
2025-05-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11024-025-09585-z
Citations
8
Primary Topic
University-Industry-Government Innovation Models
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
13.80
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Modes of Relevance in Research: Towards Understanding the Promises and Possibilities of Doing Relevance

Maximilian Fochler, Lisa Sigl, Lucas Brunet, Ruth Müller
8 citations
Minerva
University-Industry-Government Innovation Models
13.80
article

Modes of Relevance in Research: Towards Understanding the Promises and Possibilities of Doing Relevance

Maximilian Fochler, Lisa Sigl, Lucas Brunet, Ruth Müller
article en
8 citations

Abstract

Abstract In response to growing social, ecological and health-related challenges, scientists are increasingly expected to demonstrate the societal relevance of their work. This special issue critically examines the concept of “relevance” in scientific research, exploring how it is defined, enacted and contested across disciplines, institutions and collaborations. We propose a practice-oriented conceptualization of “doing relevance”, understanding it not as an inherent property of knowledge, but as a situated achievement shaped by various practices. To this end, we introduce four distinct modes of relevance: 1) relevance as reorienting research topics and disciplines; 2) relevance as engaging societal actors in user-driven research; 3) relevance as reshaping interactions between science and policy; and 4) relevance as transforming academic institutions. The contributions to this issue analyze how these four modes are enacted through the practices of diverse actors, demonstrating that relevance is not a static or self-evident concept, but is continually redefined in situated and context-specific engagements. Together, the articles illustrate how researchers navigate diverse expectations and institutional demands, leading them to enact relevance through concrete practices instead of following pre-determined criteria. We conclude by calling for future research that further explores how relevance is continually reconfigured in response to specific challenges, and how these reconfigurations enable and constrain science’s capacity to address pressing societal needs.

MinervaVol. 63(2)
University of Vienna (AT), TU Wien (AT), Radboud University Nijmegen (NL), University of Oslo (NO), Institut National de Recherche pour l'Agriculture, l'Alimentation et l'Environnement (FR), Hochschule Campus Wien (AT), Université Gustave Eiffel (FR), Technical University of Munich (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
University-Industry-Government Innovation Models
13.80
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.