Surveillance at the (inter)face: A nexus analysis

This paper discusses how facial recognition technology is changing the way interfaces are designed for digital surveillance. Drawing on work in mediated discourse analysis, it argues that interfaces for surveillance (as well as digital interfaces more generally) should be understood as sites of engagement where particular texts, bodies, social relationships, and social practices come together to make surveillance possible. To illustrate this framework, I analyse the controversial facial recognition service PimEyes, exploring how the ‘discourses in place’ on the PimEyes website, the ‘interaction orders’ it makes possible, and the ‘historical bodies’ that users bring to the site work together to lure users into using the service and contribute to the normalisation of digital surveillance using facial recognition. This paper contributes not just to our understanding of surveillance, but also to our understanding of digital interfaces more generally by showing how they function to enable new kinds of social identities, social relationships and social practices.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Discourse Context & Media
Published
2024-10-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcm.2024.100832
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Geographies of human-animal interactions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.87
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Surveillance at the (inter)face: A nexus analysis

Rodney H. Jones
3 citations
Discourse Context & Media
Geographies of human-animal interactions
5.87
article

Surveillance at the (inter)face: A nexus analysis

Rodney H. Jones
article en
3 citations

Abstract

This paper discusses how facial recognition technology is changing the way interfaces are designed for digital surveillance. Drawing on work in mediated discourse analysis, it argues that interfaces for surveillance (as well as digital interfaces more generally) should be understood as sites of engagement where particular texts, bodies, social relationships, and social practices come together to make surveillance possible. To illustrate this framework, I analyse the controversial facial recognition service PimEyes, exploring how the ‘discourses in place’ on the PimEyes website, the ‘interaction orders’ it makes possible, and the ‘historical bodies’ that users bring to the site work together to lure users into using the service and contribute to the normalisation of digital surveillance using facial recognition. This paper contributes not just to our understanding of surveillance, but also to our understanding of digital interfaces more generally by showing how they function to enable new kinds of social identities, social relationships and social practices.

Discourse Context & MediaVol. 62
University of Reading (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Geographies of human-animal interactions
5.87
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Surveillance at the (inter)face: A nexus analysis — Rodney H. Jones · Discourse Context & Media (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS