Outcomes for Female Physicians Compared With Nonphysicians After Assisted Reproductive Technology

There was no difference between female physicians and nonphysicians in assisted reproduction cycle outcomes. Physicians become pregnant slightly faster than nonphysicians.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Obstetrics and Gynecology
Published
2024-10-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/aog.0000000000005767
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Assisted Reproductive Technology and Twin Pregnancy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.11
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Outcomes for Female Physicians Compared With Nonphysicians After Assisted Reproductive Technology

Erika L. Rangel, Sarah Rae Easter, O. Camacho, Andrea Lanes et al.
1 citations
Obstetrics and Gynecology
Assisted Reproductive Technology and Twin Pregnancy
1.11
article

Outcomes for Female Physicians Compared With Nonphysicians After Assisted Reproductive Technology

Erika L. Rangel, Sarah Rae Easter, O. Camacho, Andrea Lanes, Anna Vanderhoff, Serene S. Srouji, Janis H. Fox, Rachel Herz-Roiphe, Keizra Mecklai
article en
1 citations

Abstract

There was no difference between female physicians and nonphysicians in assisted reproduction cycle outcomes. Physicians become pregnant slightly faster than nonphysicians.

Obstetrics and GynecologyVol. 145(1)
Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Assisted Reproductive Technology and Twin Pregnancy
1.11
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.