Interpreting Variations in Fugl-Meyer Assessment Protocols: Results and Recommendations From a Nominal Group Consensus Process
Variations among FMA-UE administration protocols during stroke rehabilitation studies can lead to discrepancies in the interpretation and translation of research findings across institutions and limit the perceived value and uptake of standardized assessments for evidence-based practice. The results of this nominal group consensus provide a first step toward developing cohesive FMA-UE recommendations for wider dissemination and review.
Authors
- Julia Mazariegos
- David J. Lin (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6575-9849)
- Sarah Blanton (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0137-1925)
- Veronica Rowe (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5943-5074)
- Julie A. DiCarlo (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9141-4035)
- Kelly Rishe (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0008-3676-9512)
- Susan E. Fasoli
Institutions
- Emory University (US)
- MGH Institute of Health Professions (US)
- Georgia State University (US)
- Massachusetts General Hospital (US)
- Rehabilitation Research and Development Service (US)
- Center for Neuro-Oncology (US)
- Johns Hopkins Hospital (US)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
- Published
- 2024-10-24
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2024.10.004
- Citations
- 6
- Primary Topic
- History and advancements in chemistry
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 2.67
Funders
- U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs
- Rehabilitation Research and Development Service