Comparative evaluation of surface roughness and bacterial adhesion on two bioactive cements: an in-vitro study

Alkasite impedes bacterial adhesion better than the glass hybrid restorative and nanohybrid composite, while smoother surfaces are achieved with the nanohybrid composite.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Oral Health
Published
2024-10-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-024-05083-y
Citations
10
Primary Topic
Dental materials and restorations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.02
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative evaluation of surface roughness and bacterial adhesion on two bioactive cements: an in-vitro study

Suprabha BS, Srikant Natarajan, Ramya Shenoy, Ethel Suman et al.
10 citations
BMC Oral Health
Dental materials and restorations
4.02
article

Comparative evaluation of surface roughness and bacterial adhesion on two bioactive cements: an in-vitro study

Suprabha BS, Srikant Natarajan, Ramya Shenoy, Ethel Suman, Arathi Rao, Pallabi Dey
article en
10 citations

Abstract

Alkasite impedes bacterial adhesion better than the glass hybrid restorative and nanohybrid composite, while smoother surfaces are achieved with the nanohybrid composite.

BMC Oral HealthVol. 24(1)
Manipal Academy of Higher Education (IN)
Responsible consumption and production
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Dental materials and restorations
4.02
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.