Comparative outcomes of living donor liver transplantation in elderly recipients: A study on morbidity and survival in 1018 recipients

Given the increasing demand of patients requiring liver transplants who are 70 years or older and may have health conditions, this study aimed to assess the outcomes of recipients of living donor liver transplants (LDLTs) in this age group. We conducted an analysis using a prospective registry that included all recipients of LDLT from January 2011 to May 2023. Patients were divided into 2 age groups, 18-69 years and 70 years or older, and their short-term and long-term outcomes were compared. We considered complications as major if they were grade ≥3a (Dindo-Clavien). Among 1018 recipients of LDLT, 71 (7%) were aged 70 years or older. The rates of posttransplant complications of any severity were comparable between the younger and older age groups (46.7% vs. 46%, p = 0.983), as were the rates of major complications (25% vs. 25%, p = 0.995) and in-hospital mortality (6% vs. 7%, p = 0.800). The 1-, 3-, and 5-year graft survival rates were 94%, 86%, and 81% in the younger group and 92%, 87%, and 65% in the older group ( p = 0.090). Similarly, the overall 1-, 3-, and 5-year recipient survival rates were 90%, 85%, and 86% in the younger group and 88%, 86%, and 65% in the older group ( p = 0.100). This study suggests that carefully selected elderly patients can undergo LDLT and achieve comparable short-term outcomes to their younger counterparts.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Liver Transplantation
Published
2024-10-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/lvt.0000000000000518
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Organ Transplantation Techniques and Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.72
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative outcomes of living donor liver transplantation in elderly recipients: A study on morbidity and survival in 1018 recipients

Fuat H. Saner, Dieter Broering, Massimo Malagò, Yasir Alnemary et al.
3 citations
Liver Transplantation
Organ Transplantation Techniques and Outcomes
1.72
article

Comparative outcomes of living donor liver transplantation in elderly recipients: A study on morbidity and survival in 1018 recipients

Fuat H. Saner, Dieter Broering, Massimo Malagò, Yasir Alnemary, Dimitri Aristotle Raptis, Kris Ann Hervera Marquez, Markus U. Boehnert, Sami Abdul Kareem, Yasser Elsheikh, Saleh Alabbad, Leen Alchibi
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Given the increasing demand of patients requiring liver transplants who are 70 years or older and may have health conditions, this study aimed to assess the outcomes of recipients of living donor liver transplants (LDLTs) in this age group. We conducted an analysis using a prospective registry that included all recipients of LDLT from January 2011 to May 2023. Patients were divided into 2 age groups, 18-69 years and 70 years or older, and their short-term and long-term outcomes were compared. We considered complications as major if they were grade ≥3a (Dindo-Clavien). Among 1018 recipients of LDLT, 71 (7%) were aged 70 years or older. The rates of posttransplant complications of any severity were comparable between the younger and older age groups (46.7% vs. 46%, p = 0.983), as were the rates of major complications (25% vs. 25%, p = 0.995) and in-hospital mortality (6% vs. 7%, p = 0.800). The 1-, 3-, and 5-year graft survival rates were 94%, 86%, and 81% in the younger group and 92%, 87%, and 65% in the older group ( p = 0.090). Similarly, the overall 1-, 3-, and 5-year recipient survival rates were 90%, 85%, and 86% in the younger group and 88%, 86%, and 65% in the older group ( p = 0.100). This study suggests that carefully selected elderly patients can undergo LDLT and achieve comparable short-term outcomes to their younger counterparts.

Liver TransplantationVol. 31(5)
King Faisal Specialist Hospital & Research Centre (SA), Artistic Realization Technologies (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Organ Transplantation Techniques and Outcomes
1.72
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.