Discrimination and Political Engagement: A Cross-national Test

Abstract What is the effect of personal discrimination on the political engagement of ethnic and racial minorities? Existing research theorizes increased engagement, but evidence is mixed. The discrimination and political engagement link is tested across six countries: Canada, Denmark, France, Germany, the United Kingdom, and the United States. Interest in politics and political actions (e.g. protest and donations) show constant relationships: people who have experienced discrimination have more interest in politics and take more political actions. There is no clear evidence of different effects of political vs social discrimination. However, the link between turnout and discrimination varies systematically across countries: a positive correlation in three separate American datasets, but mixed and null in other countries. This may be the result of the distinctive American conflict over voting rights for racial minorities. The conclusion discusses priorities for future research, including a focus on establishing causal relationships and testing mechanisms.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Journal of Race Ethnicity and Politics
Published
2024-10-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/rep.2024.17
Citations
7
Primary Topic
Names, Identity, and Discrimination Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
7.92

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Discrimination and Political Engagement: A Cross-national Test

Randy Besco
7 citations
The Journal of Race Ethnicity and Politics
Names, Identity, and Discrimination Research
7.92
article

Discrimination and Political Engagement: A Cross-national Test

Randy Besco
article en
7 citations

Abstract

Abstract What is the effect of personal discrimination on the political engagement of ethnic and racial minorities? Existing research theorizes increased engagement, but evidence is mixed. The discrimination and political engagement link is tested across six countries: Canada, Denmark, France, Germany, the United Kingdom, and the United States. Interest in politics and political actions (e.g. protest and donations) show constant relationships: people who have experienced discrimination have more interest in politics and take more political actions. There is no clear evidence of different effects of political vs social discrimination. However, the link between turnout and discrimination varies systematically across countries: a positive correlation in three separate American datasets, but mixed and null in other countries. This may be the result of the distinctive American conflict over voting rights for racial minorities. The conclusion discusses priorities for future research, including a focus on establishing causal relationships and testing mechanisms.

The Journal of Race Ethnicity and PoliticsVol. 9(3)
University of Toronto (CA)
Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada
Peace, Justice and strong institutions, Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Names, Identity, and Discrimination Research
7.92
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.