Deep learning improves physician accuracy in the comprehensive detection of abnormalities on chest X-rays

Chest X-rays are the most commonly performed medical imaging exam, yet they are often misinterpreted by physicians. Here, we present an FDA-cleared, artificial intelligence (AI) system which uses a deep learning algorithm to assist physicians in the comprehensive detection and localization of abnormalities on chest X-rays. We trained and tested the AI system on a large dataset, assessed generalizability on publicly available data, and evaluated radiologist and non-radiologist physician accuracy when unaided and aided by the AI system. The AI system accurately detected chest X-ray abnormalities (AUC: 0.976, 95% bootstrap CI: 0.975, 0.976) and generalized to a publicly available dataset (AUC: 0.975, 95% bootstrap CI: 0.971, 0.978). Physicians showed significant improvements in detecting abnormalities on chest X-rays when aided by the AI system compared to when unaided (difference in AUC: 0.101, p < 0.001). Non-radiologist physicians detected abnormalities on chest X-ray exams as accurately as radiologists when aided by the AI system and were faster at evaluating chest X-rays when aided compared to unaided. Together, these results show that the AI system is accurate and reduces physician errors in chest X-ray evaluation, which highlights the potential of AI systems to improve access to fast, high-quality radiograph interpretation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2024-10-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-76608-2
Citations
37
Primary Topic
Radiology practices and education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
14.96
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Deep learning improves physician accuracy in the comprehensive detection of abnormalities on chest X-rays

Hannah Tarder-Stoll, Robert Lindsey, David L. Levin, Pamela G. Anderson et al.
37 citations
Scientific Reports
Radiology practices and education
14.96
article

Deep learning improves physician accuracy in the comprehensive detection of abnormalities on chest X-rays

Hannah Tarder-Stoll, Robert Lindsey, David L. Levin, Pamela G. Anderson, Mehmet Alpaslan, Rebecca M. Jones, Scott Howell, Serge Sicular, Srivas Venkatesh, Nora Keathley, Elliot Bartel
article en
37 citations

Abstract

Chest X-rays are the most commonly performed medical imaging exam, yet they are often misinterpreted by physicians. Here, we present an FDA-cleared, artificial intelligence (AI) system which uses a deep learning algorithm to assist physicians in the comprehensive detection and localization of abnormalities on chest X-rays. We trained and tested the AI system on a large dataset, assessed generalizability on publicly available data, and evaluated radiologist and non-radiologist physician accuracy when unaided and aided by the AI system. The AI system accurately detected chest X-ray abnormalities (AUC: 0.976, 95% bootstrap CI: 0.975, 0.976) and generalized to a publicly available dataset (AUC: 0.975, 95% bootstrap CI: 0.971, 0.978). Physicians showed significant improvements in detecting abnormalities on chest X-rays when aided by the AI system compared to when unaided (difference in AUC: 0.101, p < 0.001). Non-radiologist physicians detected abnormalities on chest X-ray exams as accurately as radiologists when aided by the AI system and were faster at evaluating chest X-rays when aided compared to unaided. Together, these results show that the AI system is accurate and reduces physician errors in chest X-ray evaluation, which highlights the potential of AI systems to improve access to fast, high-quality radiograph interpretation.

Scientific ReportsVol. 14(1)
Mount Sinai Hospital (US), Palo Alto University (US), Mount Sinai Hospital (US), Faculty of 1000 (United States) (US), Institut des Maladies Génétiques Imagine (FR), Stanford University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Radiology practices and education
14.96
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.