Sensitivity analysis for attributable fraction in the presence of unmeasured confounding

A main goal of epidemiology is to provide an impact of an exposure on health outcomes. The attributable fraction (AF) is a widely used measure for quantifying its contribution. Various methods have been developed to estimate AF, including standardization, inverse probability of treatment weighting, and doubly robust methods. However, the validity of these methods is established based on the conditional exchangeability assumption, which cannot be tested using only observed data. To assess how vulnerable the research findings are to departures from this assumption, researchers need to conduct a sensitivity analysis. In this study, we propose novel sensitivity analysis methods for AF. Sensitivity analysis problems are formulated as optimization problems, and analytic solutions for the problem are derived. We illustrate our proposed sensitivity analysis methods with a publicly available data set and examine how the AF of the mother's smoking status during pregnancy for low birth weight changes to the degree of unmeasured confounding.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
American Journal of Epidemiology
Published
2024-10-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwae409
Primary Topic
Advanced Causal Inference Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Sensitivity analysis for attributable fraction in the presence of unmeasured confounding

An‐Shun Tai, Woojoo Lee, Whanhee Lee, Hyunman Sim
American Journal of Epidemiology
Advanced Causal Inference Techniques
article

Sensitivity analysis for attributable fraction in the presence of unmeasured confounding

An‐Shun Tai, Woojoo Lee, Whanhee Lee, Hyunman Sim
article en

Abstract

A main goal of epidemiology is to provide an impact of an exposure on health outcomes. The attributable fraction (AF) is a widely used measure for quantifying its contribution. Various methods have been developed to estimate AF, including standardization, inverse probability of treatment weighting, and doubly robust methods. However, the validity of these methods is established based on the conditional exchangeability assumption, which cannot be tested using only observed data. To assess how vulnerable the research findings are to departures from this assumption, researchers need to conduct a sensitivity analysis. In this study, we propose novel sensitivity analysis methods for AF. Sensitivity analysis problems are formulated as optimization problems, and analytic solutions for the problem are derived. We illustrate our proposed sensitivity analysis methods with a publicly available data set and examine how the AF of the mother's smoking status during pregnancy for low birth weight changes to the degree of unmeasured confounding.

American Journal of EpidemiologyVol. 194(8)
Seoul National University (KR), National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University (TW), Convergence (US), Pusan National University (KR), National Cheng Kung University (TW)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 81%
Advanced Causal Inference Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.