Reconsidering government digital strategies within the context of digital inequalities: the case of the UK Digital Strategy

Abstract In this paper, we critically examine the 2022 UK Digital Strategy and argue that the UK government adopts with this policy document a customer-centric vision of governance, which undermines the traditional role of the government as a provider of public services with principles of justice and impartiality. This shift, exacerbated by digital poverty, appears incongruent with the social contract between citizens and the state. We employ a critical discourse analysis to identify contradictory outcomes resulting from these neoliberal policies and showcase that the UK Digital Strategy, while seemingly committed to aspects of equality and inclusivity, appear to prioritise almost entirely market rather than citizens’ interests.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Humanities and Social Sciences Communications
Published
2024-10-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-024-03921-6
Citations
6
Primary Topic
E-Government and Public Services
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
13.39
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Reconsidering government digital strategies within the context of digital inequalities: the case of the UK Digital Strategy

Efpraxia D. Zamani, Anastasia Rousaki
6 citations
Humanities and Social Sciences Communications
E-Government and Public Services
13.39
article

Reconsidering government digital strategies within the context of digital inequalities: the case of the UK Digital Strategy

Efpraxia D. Zamani, Anastasia Rousaki
article en
6 citations

Abstract

Abstract In this paper, we critically examine the 2022 UK Digital Strategy and argue that the UK government adopts with this policy document a customer-centric vision of governance, which undermines the traditional role of the government as a provider of public services with principles of justice and impartiality. This shift, exacerbated by digital poverty, appears incongruent with the social contract between citizens and the state. We employ a critical discourse analysis to identify contradictory outcomes resulting from these neoliberal policies and showcase that the UK Digital Strategy, while seemingly committed to aspects of equality and inclusivity, appear to prioritise almost entirely market rather than citizens’ interests.

Humanities and Social Sciences CommunicationsVol. 11(1)
Durham University (GB), University of Sheffield (GB)
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
E-Government and Public Services
13.39
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.