Only consciousness truly exists? Two problems for IIT 4.0’s ontology

In this article we present two ontological problems for the Integrated Information Theory of Consciousness 4.0: what we call the (i) the intrinsicality 2.0 problem, and (ii) the engineering problem. These problems entail that truly existing, conscious entities can depend on, and be engineered from, entities that do not objectively exist, which is problematic: if something does not exist in objective reality (i.e., in itself, independently of another entity's consciousness), then it seems that it cannot be part of the material basis and determinants of other entities that do exist on their own. We argue that the core origin of these problems lies in IIT's equation between true existence and phenomenal existence (consciousness), and the corresponding ontological exclusion of non-conscious physical entities (i.e., extrinsic entities) from objective reality. In short, these two problems seem to show that IIT should reconsider the ontological status of these extrinsic entities, because they need to exist objectively to account for the ontological implications of the scenarios we present here, which are permitted by the operational framework of the theory.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Psychology
Published
2024-10-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1485433
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Cognitive Computing and Networks
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.39

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Only consciousness truly exists? Two problems for IIT 4.0’s ontology

Niccolò Negro, Camilo Miguel Signorelli, Ignacio Cea
4 citations
Frontiers in Psychology
Cognitive Computing and Networks
1.39
article

Only consciousness truly exists? Two problems for IIT 4.0’s ontology

Niccolò Negro, Camilo Miguel Signorelli, Ignacio Cea
article en
4 citations

Abstract

In this article we present two ontological problems for the Integrated Information Theory of Consciousness 4.0: what we call the (i) the intrinsicality 2.0 problem, and (ii) the engineering problem. These problems entail that truly existing, conscious entities can depend on, and be engineered from, entities that do not objectively exist, which is problematic: if something does not exist in objective reality (i.e., in itself, independently of another entity's consciousness), then it seems that it cannot be part of the material basis and determinants of other entities that do exist on their own. We argue that the core origin of these problems lies in IIT's equation between true existence and phenomenal existence (consciousness), and the corresponding ontological exclusion of non-conscious physical entities (i.e., extrinsic entities) from objective reality. In short, these two problems seem to show that IIT should reconsider the ontological status of these extrinsic entities, because they need to exist objectively to account for the ontological implications of the scenarios we present here, which are permitted by the operational framework of the theory.

Frontiers in PsychologyVol. 15
University of Copenhagen (DK), Université Libre de Bruxelles (BE), Tel Aviv University (IL), Universidad Católica de Temuco (CL), Alberto Hurtado University (CL), University of Oxford (GB)
Fonds De La Recherche Scientifique - FNRS, Azrieli Foundation
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Cognitive Computing and Networks
1.39
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.