Preserving and Presenting the Rotterdam Erasmus Collection since 1868

Abstract The unique collection of Erasmiana in the Rotterdam Public Library has a long history in which there has been varying attention to acquisition, preservation and presentation. This article describes how individuals such as donors, directors and curators developed the collection since it was first mentioned in 1868. This development is reconstructed through archival sources such as year reports, newspaper articles and material evidence in the collection itself. From this reconstruction, it is possible to distinguish three phases in the history of the Erasmus Collection in which it was treated as respectively an archival collection, a scholarly source and a heritage collection. The case study shows why it is important for scholars who make use of a collection to understand the historical development of its contents and the status of the collection as such. Furthermore, knowledge of the history of a collection is valuable for exploring today’s balance between preservation and presentation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Erasmus Studies
Published
2024-10-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1163/18749275-04402004
Primary Topic
Historical Influence and Diplomacy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Preserving and Presenting the Rotterdam Erasmus Collection since 1868

Sanne Steen, John Tholen
Erasmus Studies
Historical Influence and Diplomacy
article

Preserving and Presenting the Rotterdam Erasmus Collection since 1868

Sanne Steen, John Tholen
article en

Abstract

Abstract The unique collection of Erasmiana in the Rotterdam Public Library has a long history in which there has been varying attention to acquisition, preservation and presentation. This article describes how individuals such as donors, directors and curators developed the collection since it was first mentioned in 1868. This development is reconstructed through archival sources such as year reports, newspaper articles and material evidence in the collection itself. From this reconstruction, it is possible to distinguish three phases in the history of the Erasmus Collection in which it was treated as respectively an archival collection, a scholarly source and a heritage collection. The case study shows why it is important for scholars who make use of a collection to understand the historical development of its contents and the status of the collection as such. Furthermore, knowledge of the history of a collection is valuable for exploring today’s balance between preservation and presentation.

Erasmus StudiesVol. 44(2)
Erasmus University Rotterdam (NL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 70%
Historical Influence and Diplomacy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Preserving and Presenting the Rotterdam Erasmus Collection since 1868 — Sanne Steen, John Tholen · Erasmus Studies (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS