ADVANCEMENTS IN AIRLINE SECURITY: EVALUATING MACHINE LEARNING MODELS FOR THREAT DETECTION

This study assessed the performance of four machine learning algorithms—Decision Tree (DT), Random Forest (RF), Support Vector Machine (SVM), and Neural Network (NN)—for predicting airline security threats using a dataset of 100,000 entries with 30 features. The models were evaluated based on accuracy, precision, recall, F1-Score, and AUC-ROC. The Neural Network achieved the highest performance, with an accuracy of 88%, precision of 86%, recall of 85%, F1-Score of 85.5%, and AUC-ROC of 0.90, demonstrating superior capability in capturing complex, non-linear patterns. The Random Forest model followed, with an accuracy of 85%, precision of 83%, recall of 82%, F1-Score of 82.5%, and AUC-ROC of 0.87, offering a robust and generalizable solution. The SVM model attained an accuracy of 81%, precision of 80%, recall of 78%, F1-Score of 79%, and AUC-ROC of 0.84, showing effective binary classification but with higher computational costs. The Decision Tree model, while interpretable, had the lowest performance metrics: accuracy of 78%, precision of 76%, recall of 72%, F1-Score of 74%, and AUC-ROC of 0.79. The results indicate that Neural Networks and Random Forests are the most effective models for airline security threat detection, with Neural Networks providing the highest overall accuracy and AUC-ROC.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
The American Journal of Engineering And Technology
Published
2024-10-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.37547/tajet/volume06issue10-10
Primary Topic
Anomaly Detection Techniques and Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

ADVANCEMENTS IN AIRLINE SECURITY: EVALUATING MACHINE LEARNING MODELS FOR THREAT DETECTION

Md Khorshed Alam, Badruddowza Badruddowza, Abdullah Al Mamun, Md Tarek Hasan et al.
The American Journal of Engineering And Technology
Anomaly Detection Techniques and Applications
article

ADVANCEMENTS IN AIRLINE SECURITY: EVALUATING MACHINE LEARNING MODELS FOR THREAT DETECTION

Md Khorshed Alam, Badruddowza Badruddowza, Abdullah Al Mamun, Md Tarek Hasan, Fuad Mahmud, Mashaeikh Zaman Md. Eftakhar Choudhury, Md Shohail Uddin Sarker, Jannatul Ferdous Shorna
article en

Abstract

This study assessed the performance of four machine learning algorithms—Decision Tree (DT), Random Forest (RF), Support Vector Machine (SVM), and Neural Network (NN)—for predicting airline security threats using a dataset of 100,000 entries with 30 features. The models were evaluated based on accuracy, precision, recall, F1-Score, and AUC-ROC. The Neural Network achieved the highest performance, with an accuracy of 88%, precision of 86%, recall of 85%, F1-Score of 85.5%, and AUC-ROC of 0.90, demonstrating superior capability in capturing complex, non-linear patterns. The Random Forest model followed, with an accuracy of 85%, precision of 83%, recall of 82%, F1-Score of 82.5%, and AUC-ROC of 0.87, offering a robust and generalizable solution. The SVM model attained an accuracy of 81%, precision of 80%, recall of 78%, F1-Score of 79%, and AUC-ROC of 0.84, showing effective binary classification but with higher computational costs. The Decision Tree model, while interpretable, had the lowest performance metrics: accuracy of 78%, precision of 76%, recall of 72%, F1-Score of 74%, and AUC-ROC of 0.79. The results indicate that Neural Networks and Random Forests are the most effective models for airline security threat detection, with Neural Networks providing the highest overall accuracy and AUC-ROC.

The American Journal of Engineering And TechnologyVol. 06(10)
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 84%
Anomaly Detection Techniques and Applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.