Behavioral trace data in an online learning environment as indicators of learning engagement in university students

Learning in asynchronous online settings (AOSs) is challenging for university students. However, the construct of learning engagement (LE) represents a possible lever to identify and reduce challenges while learning online, especially, in AOSs. Learning analytics provides a fruitful framework to analyze students' learning processes and LE via trace data. The study, therefore, addresses the questions of whether LE can be modeled with the sub-dimensions of effort, attention, and content interest and by which trace data, derived from behavior within an AOS, these facets of LE are represented in self-reports. Participants were 764 university students attending an AOS. The results of best-subset regression analysis show that a model combining multiple indicators can account for a proportion of the variance in students' LE (highly significant <i>R</i> <sup>2</sup> between 0.04 and 0.13). The identified set of indicators is stable over time supporting the transferability to similar learning contexts. The results of this study can contribute to both research on learning processes in AOSs in higher education and the application of learning analytics in university teaching (e.g., modeling automated feedback).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Psychology
Published
2024-10-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1396881
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Online Learning and Analytics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.06

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Behavioral trace data in an online learning environment as indicators of learning engagement in university students

Carolin Hahnel, Daniel Biedermann, Daniel Bengs, Ilka Wolter et al.
5 citations
Frontiers in Psychology
Online Learning and Analytics
2.06
article

Behavioral trace data in an online learning environment as indicators of learning engagement in university students

Carolin Hahnel, Daniel Biedermann, Daniel Bengs, Ilka Wolter, Hendrik Drachsler, Julia Mendzheritskaya, Cordula Artelt, Frank Goldhammer, George-Petru Ciordas-Hertel, Julia Mordel, Marc Winter, Holger Horz
article en
5 citations

Abstract

Learning in asynchronous online settings (AOSs) is challenging for university students. However, the construct of learning engagement (LE) represents a possible lever to identify and reduce challenges while learning online, especially, in AOSs. Learning analytics provides a fruitful framework to analyze students' learning processes and LE via trace data. The study, therefore, addresses the questions of whether LE can be modeled with the sub-dimensions of effort, attention, and content interest and by which trace data, derived from behavior within an AOS, these facets of LE are represented in self-reports. Participants were 764 university students attending an AOS. The results of best-subset regression analysis show that a model combining multiple indicators can account for a proportion of the variance in students' LE (highly significant <i>R</i> <sup>2</sup> between 0.04 and 0.13). The identified set of indicators is stable over time supporting the transferability to similar learning contexts. The results of this study can contribute to both research on learning processes in AOSs in higher education and the application of learning analytics in university teaching (e.g., modeling automated feedback).

Frontiers in PsychologyVol. 15
Goethe University Frankfurt (DE), University Hospitals of the Ruhr-University of Bochum (DE), DIPF | Leibniz Institute for Research and Information in Education (DE), Leibniz Institute for Educational Trajectories (DE), Frankfurt University of Applied Sciences (DE), Ruhr University Bochum (DE)
Leibniz-Gemeinschaft
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Online Learning and Analytics
2.06
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.