Exploring the differences in processing between Chinese emotion and emotion-laden words: A cross-task comparison study

Affective words can be classified into two types: emotion words (EM words, e.g., "happy") and emotion-laden words (EL words, e.g., "wedding"). Several studies have shown differences in processing between EM and EL words, although results are inconclusive. These two types of words may have representational differences because affective content is an inherent part of the semantic features of EM words (i.e., denotative meaning) but not of EL words, whose affective content is part of their connotative meaning (i.e., these words do not name emotions, but are associated with emotions). In this study, we tested a set of Chinese EM and EL words. Both conditions included positive and negative words. The study involved two tasks, an implicit task, in which emotional content was not relevant (lexical decision task, LDT), and an explicit task, in which the emotional content was relevant (affective categorisation task, ACT). Our results showed that participants responded faster to EM words than to EL words. This advantage was mostly observed in the ACT and with negative words. These results reveal differences in processing between EM and EL words which can be related to the greater relevance of affective content in the meaning of EM words compared with EL words.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology
Published
2024-10-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/17470218241296695
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Language, Metaphor, and Cognition
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.54

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Exploring the differences in processing between Chinese emotion and emotion-laden words: A cross-task comparison study

Marc Guasch, Meng Zhang, Pilar Ferré, Ruiyao Zheng
5 citations
Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology
Language, Metaphor, and Cognition
2.54
article

Exploring the differences in processing between Chinese emotion and emotion-laden words: A cross-task comparison study

Marc Guasch, Meng Zhang, Pilar Ferré, Ruiyao Zheng
article en
5 citations

Abstract

Affective words can be classified into two types: emotion words (EM words, e.g., "happy") and emotion-laden words (EL words, e.g., "wedding"). Several studies have shown differences in processing between EM and EL words, although results are inconclusive. These two types of words may have representational differences because affective content is an inherent part of the semantic features of EM words (i.e., denotative meaning) but not of EL words, whose affective content is part of their connotative meaning (i.e., these words do not name emotions, but are associated with emotions). In this study, we tested a set of Chinese EM and EL words. Both conditions included positive and negative words. The study involved two tasks, an implicit task, in which emotional content was not relevant (lexical decision task, LDT), and an explicit task, in which the emotional content was relevant (affective categorisation task, ACT). Our results showed that participants responded faster to EM words than to EL words. This advantage was mostly observed in the ACT and with negative words. These results reveal differences in processing between EM and EL words which can be related to the greater relevance of affective content in the meaning of EM words compared with EL words.

Quarterly Journal of Experimental PsychologyVol. 78(7)
Sichuan International Studies University (CN), Universitat Rovira i Virgili (ES)
Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación, Universitat Rovira i Virgili
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Language, Metaphor, and Cognition
2.54
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.