Relationships between self-efficacy and learning approaches as perceived by computer science students

Optimizing learning outcomes in university students necessitates an understanding of the processes that drive high-quality learning outcomes. This study investigates the motivational factors and learning methodologies perceived by computer science students during an introductory course. A cross-sectional study was conducted with 171 computer science students asked to complete a psychometric instrument (“Study Skills Inventory for Students”) during the first year of their university studies. Two major theoretical frameworks in educational psychology, namely students’ self-efficacy and learning approaches were tested relative to a factor structure obtained from learning situations. The findings supported self-efficacy and three learning approaches among computer science students. Models for deep, surface, and strategic learning approaches suggest that students with higher self-efficacy tend to adopt a deeper approach to learning. Conversely, students with lower self-efficacy were more inclined toward surface learning methods. Furthermore, a link was identified between strategic learning approaches and students’ experiences within their learning environments. The results substantiate earlier research and align with learning approach theories. The findings indicated that, in higher education settings, focus should be directed toward understanding the motivational factors influencing students and their learning approaches for educational outcomes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Education
Published
2024-10-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2024.1181616
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Online and Blended Learning
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.38

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Relationships between self-efficacy and learning approaches as perceived by computer science students

Satu Laitinen, Päivi Laitinen, Athanasios Christopoulos, Valtteri Nieminen
4 citations
Frontiers in Education
Online and Blended Learning
8.38
article

Relationships between self-efficacy and learning approaches as perceived by computer science students

Satu Laitinen, Päivi Laitinen, Athanasios Christopoulos, Valtteri Nieminen
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Optimizing learning outcomes in university students necessitates an understanding of the processes that drive high-quality learning outcomes. This study investigates the motivational factors and learning methodologies perceived by computer science students during an introductory course. A cross-sectional study was conducted with 171 computer science students asked to complete a psychometric instrument (“Study Skills Inventory for Students”) during the first year of their university studies. Two major theoretical frameworks in educational psychology, namely students’ self-efficacy and learning approaches were tested relative to a factor structure obtained from learning situations. The findings supported self-efficacy and three learning approaches among computer science students. Models for deep, surface, and strategic learning approaches suggest that students with higher self-efficacy tend to adopt a deeper approach to learning. Conversely, students with lower self-efficacy were more inclined toward surface learning methods. Furthermore, a link was identified between strategic learning approaches and students’ experiences within their learning environments. The results substantiate earlier research and align with learning approach theories. The findings indicated that, in higher education settings, focus should be directed toward understanding the motivational factors influencing students and their learning approaches for educational outcomes.

Frontiers in EducationVol. 9
University of Turku (FI)
Turun Yliopisto
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Online and Blended Learning
8.38
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.