Making sense of clandestine graves: Material epistemology and the political geography of uncertain knowledge

How might we begin to establish meaning, understanding and justice out of something that is meant not to be found? In this article, we approach the growing problem of clandestine graves to ask what can be read from them, including why they matter, why they are found, and how they are becoming an intractable part of life for millions of citizens. Departing from the clandestine graves of São Paulo and Mexico, we argue that these material spaces are produced by ambiguous governance structures, and in turn reproduce them in ways that are unevenly knowable. The characteristics of these spaces that are otherwise shrouded in suspicion and deliberate efforts to make them unknowable reveal patterns and practices of political order while simultaneously creating certainty and fear about the governance they perpetuate. In taking the mass grave as an epistemology, we seek to establish identifiable tenents and patterns for further research and action while recognizing the challenges in asserting a knowledge claim about material spaces that are so intentionally, but unevenly, unknowable.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Political Geography
Published
2024-10-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polgeo.2024.103223
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Water Governance and Infrastructure
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.46

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Making sense of clandestine graves: Material epistemology and the political geography of uncertain knowledge

Graham Denyer Willis, Angélica Durán‐Martínez
2 citations
Political Geography
Water Governance and Infrastructure
4.46
article

Making sense of clandestine graves: Material epistemology and the political geography of uncertain knowledge

Graham Denyer Willis, Angélica Durán‐Martínez
article en
2 citations

Abstract

How might we begin to establish meaning, understanding and justice out of something that is meant not to be found? In this article, we approach the growing problem of clandestine graves to ask what can be read from them, including why they matter, why they are found, and how they are becoming an intractable part of life for millions of citizens. Departing from the clandestine graves of São Paulo and Mexico, we argue that these material spaces are produced by ambiguous governance structures, and in turn reproduce them in ways that are unevenly knowable. The characteristics of these spaces that are otherwise shrouded in suspicion and deliberate efforts to make them unknowable reveal patterns and practices of political order while simultaneously creating certainty and fear about the governance they perpetuate. In taking the mass grave as an epistemology, we seek to establish identifiable tenents and patterns for further research and action while recognizing the challenges in asserting a knowledge claim about material spaces that are so intentionally, but unevenly, unknowable.

Political GeographyVol. 115
University of Massachusetts Lowell (US), University of Cambridge (GB)
Leverhulme Trust
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Water Governance and Infrastructure
4.46
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Making sense of clandestine graves: Material epistemology and the political geography of uncertain knowledge — Graham Denyer Willis, Angélica Durán‐Martínez · Political Geography (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS