Elucidating Protein Structures in the Gas Phase: Traversing Configuration Space with Biasing Methods

Achieving accurate characterization of protein structures in the gas phase continues to be a formidable challenge. To tackle this issue, the present study employs Molecular Dynamics (MD) simulations in tandem with enhanced sampling techniques (methods designed to efficiently explore protein conformations). The objective is to identify suitable structures of proteins by contrasting their calculated Collision Cross-Section (CCS) with those observed experimentally. Significant discrepancies were observed between the initial MD-simulated and experimentally measured CCS values through Ion Mobility-Mass Spectrometry (IMS-MS). To bridge this gap, we employed two distinct enhanced sampling methods, Harmonic Biasing Potential and Adaptive Biasing Force, which help the proteins overcome energy barriers to adopt more compact configurations. These techniques leverage the radius of gyration as a reaction coordinate (guiding parameter), guiding the system toward compressed states that potentially match experimental configurations more closely. The guiding forces are only employed to overcome existing barriers and are removed to allow the protein to naturally arrive at a potential gas phase configuration. The results demonstrated close alignment (within ∼4%) between simulated and experimental CCS values despite using different strengths and/or methods, validating their efficacy. This work lays the groundwork for future studies aimed at optimizing biasing methods and expanding the collective variables used for more accurate gas-phase structural predictions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation
Published
2024-10-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jctc.4c00288
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Protein Structure and Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.47

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Elucidating Protein Structures in the Gas Phase: Traversing Configuration Space with Biasing Methods

Viraj Gandhi, Morgan Lawrenz, Iain D. G. Campuzano, Amber D. Rolland et al.
2 citations
Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation
Protein Structure and Dynamics
0.47
article

Elucidating Protein Structures in the Gas Phase: Traversing Configuration Space with Biasing Methods

Viraj Gandhi, Morgan Lawrenz, Iain D. G. Campuzano, Amber D. Rolland, Carlos Larriba‐Andaluz, Leyan Hua, Mohsen Latif
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Achieving accurate characterization of protein structures in the gas phase continues to be a formidable challenge. To tackle this issue, the present study employs Molecular Dynamics (MD) simulations in tandem with enhanced sampling techniques (methods designed to efficiently explore protein conformations). The objective is to identify suitable structures of proteins by contrasting their calculated Collision Cross-Section (CCS) with those observed experimentally. Significant discrepancies were observed between the initial MD-simulated and experimentally measured CCS values through Ion Mobility-Mass Spectrometry (IMS-MS). To bridge this gap, we employed two distinct enhanced sampling methods, Harmonic Biasing Potential and Adaptive Biasing Force, which help the proteins overcome energy barriers to adopt more compact configurations. These techniques leverage the radius of gyration as a reaction coordinate (guiding parameter), guiding the system toward compressed states that potentially match experimental configurations more closely. The guiding forces are only employed to overcome existing barriers and are removed to allow the protein to naturally arrive at a potential gas phase configuration. The results demonstrated close alignment (within ∼4%) between simulated and experimental CCS values despite using different strengths and/or methods, validating their efficacy. This work lays the groundwork for future studies aimed at optimizing biasing methods and expanding the collective variables used for more accurate gas-phase structural predictions.

Journal of Chemical Theory and ComputationVol. 20(21)
Amgen (United States) (US), University of Oregon (US), Purdue University West Lafayette (US), Indiana University – Purdue University Indianapolis (US)
Division of Chemistry
Openalex Percentile: Top 34%
Protein Structure and Dynamics
0.47
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.