Passive Exoskeletons During Live Surgeries: Supporting Forward Head Postures Among Veterinary Surgeons

TECHNICAL ABSTRACT<b>Background:</b> Musculoskeletal symptoms (MSS) are prevalent among veterinary surgeons. Recent research has proposed exoskeletons as potential solutions in reducing the risk of musculoskeletal disorders among surgeons, but no studies have addressed the neck forward postures (opposite of overhead work), a unique ergonomic neck risk, commonly required during live, open surgery. <b>Purpose:</b> We explored the effectiveness of a passive neck-support exoskeleton during live veterinary surgical procedures with experienced surgeons. <b>Methods:</b> We employed a within-subject crossover design involving surgeons who participated in procedures across specialties including soft tissue and orthopedics. Participants performed entire surgeries with and without a front head posture support prototype exoskeleton, and they completed pre- and post-surgical surveys to assess MSS and perceived effort. The Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test was used to compare median values of MSS and the perceived effort of each participant when they operated with and without the exoskeleton. <b>Results:</b> We collected data during 28 procedures involving eight surgeons, with each subject performing at least one surgery with (intervention) and at least one surgery without (control) the exoskeleton (randomized order). The number of control and intervention cases for each participant was balanced. We found that the difference in neck stiffness before and after surgery was greater in the control surgeries compared to when using the exoskeleton intervention. Increases in neck pain and neck stiffness were only observed in control cases, whereas no participant reported increased neck pain or neck stiffness when the exoskeleton was used. <b>Conclusion:</b> Our results indicate that a passive forward head posture support exoskeleton is a promising intervention for reducing the risk of MSS in live surgical procedures.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
IISE Transactions on Occupational Ergonomics and Human Factors
Published
2024-10-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/24725838.2024.2411552
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Veterinary Practice and Education Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.75
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Passive Exoskeletons During Live Surgeries: Supporting Forward Head Postures Among Veterinary Surgeons

Sun-Young Kim, Bowen Zheng, Haozhi Chen, Denny Yu et al.
2 citations
IISE Transactions on Occupational Ergonomics and Human Factors
Veterinary Practice and Education Studies
1.75
article

Passive Exoskeletons During Live Surgeries: Supporting Forward Head Postures Among Veterinary Surgeons

Sun-Young Kim, Bowen Zheng, Haozhi Chen, Denny Yu, Xinsheng Zhou
article en
2 citations

Abstract

TECHNICAL ABSTRACT<b>Background:</b> Musculoskeletal symptoms (MSS) are prevalent among veterinary surgeons. Recent research has proposed exoskeletons as potential solutions in reducing the risk of musculoskeletal disorders among surgeons, but no studies have addressed the neck forward postures (opposite of overhead work), a unique ergonomic neck risk, commonly required during live, open surgery. <b>Purpose:</b> We explored the effectiveness of a passive neck-support exoskeleton during live veterinary surgical procedures with experienced surgeons. <b>Methods:</b> We employed a within-subject crossover design involving surgeons who participated in procedures across specialties including soft tissue and orthopedics. Participants performed entire surgeries with and without a front head posture support prototype exoskeleton, and they completed pre- and post-surgical surveys to assess MSS and perceived effort. The Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test was used to compare median values of MSS and the perceived effort of each participant when they operated with and without the exoskeleton. <b>Results:</b> We collected data during 28 procedures involving eight surgeons, with each subject performing at least one surgery with (intervention) and at least one surgery without (control) the exoskeleton (randomized order). The number of control and intervention cases for each participant was balanced. We found that the difference in neck stiffness before and after surgery was greater in the control surgeries compared to when using the exoskeleton intervention. Increases in neck pain and neck stiffness were only observed in control cases, whereas no participant reported increased neck pain or neck stiffness when the exoskeleton was used. <b>Conclusion:</b> Our results indicate that a passive forward head posture support exoskeleton is a promising intervention for reducing the risk of MSS in live surgical procedures.

IISE Transactions on Occupational Ergonomics and Human FactorsVol. 13(1)
Purdue University West Lafayette (US)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Veterinary Practice and Education Studies
1.75
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.