Accuracy and Computational Cost Comparison of Numerical Flight Dynamics Reduced-Order Models

This paper compares several approaches to model the unsteady and nonlinear longitudinal aerodynamics of a generic unmanned combat air vehicle configuration based on computational fluid dynamics (CFD). Three different reduced-order models (ROMs) are implemented through unsteady simulations to predict the evolution of forces and moments during prescribed trajectories carried out at [Formula: see text]. The first model investigates a linear quasi-steady model based on a first-order Taylor series expansion of the aerodynamic coefficients. The second one picks up the mathematical formulation of the first model but adds a dynamic coefficient in order to take into account the unsteady effect of rotation rate variations. Finally, the third model is built on indicial functions computed from positive step changes in the angle of attack or pitch rate. The unknown parameters of the first two models and the unknown indicial functions of the third one are obtained, respectively, from the study of forced oscillations and step motions. These prescribed trajectories are performed using unsteady Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes simulations coupled with a grid displacement tool. Two different methods are tested and compared to carry out the CFD mesh motions: an overset method and a full moving grid (FMG) method. The indicial functions obtained using the FMG method give results equivalent to those found in the literature in half the time of the overset method. To reduce the computational costs to set up the ROMs, the FMG method is preferred to the overset method. ROMs are then applied, and their predictions are compared with CFD simulations for prescribed trajectories with different angular rates and angles of attack. A study of instantaneous and overall accuracy associated with the implementation cost of the ROMs has allowed to show their strengths and their weaknesses. Similar results are observed at low angles of attack for the ROMs studied, while a major modeling advantage of the indicial method has been identified for higher angles of attack in the nonlinear domain.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
AIAA Journal
Published
2024-10-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2514/1.j064309
Primary Topic
Computational Fluid Dynamics and Aerodynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Accuracy and Computational Cost Comparison of Numerical Flight Dynamics Reduced-Order Models

Jean-Marc Foucaut, Geoffrey Tanguy, Baptiste Isnard, Dominique Farcy et al.
AIAA Journal
Computational Fluid Dynamics and Aerodynamics
article

Accuracy and Computational Cost Comparison of Numerical Flight Dynamics Reduced-Order Models

Jean-Marc Foucaut, Geoffrey Tanguy, Baptiste Isnard, Dominique Farcy, Alain Dugeai, Éric Garnier
article en

Abstract

This paper compares several approaches to model the unsteady and nonlinear longitudinal aerodynamics of a generic unmanned combat air vehicle configuration based on computational fluid dynamics (CFD). Three different reduced-order models (ROMs) are implemented through unsteady simulations to predict the evolution of forces and moments during prescribed trajectories carried out at [Formula: see text]. The first model investigates a linear quasi-steady model based on a first-order Taylor series expansion of the aerodynamic coefficients. The second one picks up the mathematical formulation of the first model but adds a dynamic coefficient in order to take into account the unsteady effect of rotation rate variations. Finally, the third model is built on indicial functions computed from positive step changes in the angle of attack or pitch rate. The unknown parameters of the first two models and the unknown indicial functions of the third one are obtained, respectively, from the study of forced oscillations and step motions. These prescribed trajectories are performed using unsteady Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes simulations coupled with a grid displacement tool. Two different methods are tested and compared to carry out the CFD mesh motions: an overset method and a full moving grid (FMG) method. The indicial functions obtained using the FMG method give results equivalent to those found in the literature in half the time of the overset method. To reduce the computational costs to set up the ROMs, the FMG method is preferred to the overset method. ROMs are then applied, and their predictions are compared with CFD simulations for prescribed trajectories with different angular rates and angles of attack. A study of instantaneous and overall accuracy associated with the implementation cost of the ROMs has allowed to show their strengths and their weaknesses. Similar results are observed at low angles of attack for the ROMs studied, while a major modeling advantage of the indicial method has been identified for higher angles of attack in the nonlinear domain.

AIAA JournalVol. 63(2)
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR), Arts et Métiers (FR), Université de Lille (FR), Institut Catholique d'Arts et Métiers (FR), Laboratoire de Mécanique des Fluides de Lille - Kampé de Fériet (FR), HESAM Université (FR), École Centrale de Lille (FR)
Région Hauts-de-France
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 79%
Computational Fluid Dynamics and Aerodynamics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.