Governmentality and the Common Law: Expansion of “Mind” 1835–1885

Abstract The nineteenth century saw significant changes in how the law articulated the assessment of those who came before the courts. The judges made greater, and more refined, use of the concept of the mind as a way to refer to the internal lives of the parties. Using a Foucauldian lens, judgments from the sub-disciplines of criminal, succession and contract law will be assessed. Two specific aspects will be considered—the manner in which the law disciplined the subjects themselves and the manner in which the profession operated as a form of externalised governance. This deployment of the term “mind” used by the judges conforms with the idea that the law was taking on a new role in the governance of English society while emphasising specific tensions within each area.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue internationale de Sémiotique juridique
Published
2024-10-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11196-024-10217-0
Primary Topic
Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Governmentality and the Common Law: Expansion of “Mind” 1835–1885

Chris Dent
International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue internationale de Sémiotique juridique
Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies
article

Governmentality and the Common Law: Expansion of “Mind” 1835–1885

Chris Dent
article en

Abstract

Abstract The nineteenth century saw significant changes in how the law articulated the assessment of those who came before the courts. The judges made greater, and more refined, use of the concept of the mind as a way to refer to the internal lives of the parties. Using a Foucauldian lens, judgments from the sub-disciplines of criminal, succession and contract law will be assessed. Two specific aspects will be considered—the manner in which the law disciplined the subjects themselves and the manner in which the profession operated as a form of externalised governance. This deployment of the term “mind” used by the judges conforms with the idea that the law was taking on a new role in the governance of English society while emphasising specific tensions within each area.

International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue internationale de Sémiotique juridique
Murdoch University (AU)
Murdoch University
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 70%
Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.