The use of surrogate matrices in bioanalytical preclinical safety testing using chromatographic methods: a recommendation from the European Bioanalysis forum

Within the bioanalytical community, the use of blank matrix from preclinical animals for bioanalytical method validation and sample analysis is common practice and required in the context of guidelines for bioanalytical method validation. At the same time, its use has been challenged by the scientific community for decades, since there is ample scientific evidence to allow the use surrogate matrices for this purpose. Nevertheless, legacy and current regulatory thinking continues to be reluctant to allow the use of surrogate matrices in bioanalytical testing except for so-called rare matrices. As part of ongoing discussions in relation to the ICH M10 Guideline, the European Bioanalysis Forum re-challenges the unnecessary use of blank matrices from preclinical animals and believes that, as part of community responsibility and ethical standards and when supported by data, the use of surrogate matrices should become widely accepted. It is in this context that targeted experiments were conducted within the European Bioanalysis Forum to gather additional data and re-open the discussions with all involved and that it should become acceptable to use surrogate matrices wherever possible.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Bioanalysis
Published
2024-10-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/17576180.2024.2416360
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Biosimilars and Bioanalytical Methods
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.72
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The use of surrogate matrices in bioanalytical preclinical safety testing using chromatographic methods: a recommendation from the European Bioanalysis forum

Philip Timmerman, Lee Goodwin, Nico van de Merbel, Sune Hove Sporring et al.
3 citations
Bioanalysis
Biosimilars and Bioanalytical Methods
0.72
article

The use of surrogate matrices in bioanalytical preclinical safety testing using chromatographic methods: a recommendation from the European Bioanalysis forum

Philip Timmerman, Lee Goodwin, Nico van de Merbel, Sune Hove Sporring, Lutz Eggers, Alessandro Greco, Mark Jean Gnoth, Daniel Mascher, Susanne Globig, Peter Huber, J.M. Jansat, Luca Ferrari, Robert Wheller, Stuart McDougall, J. Faber, H.M. Hawthorne, Jens-Jakob Karlsson, Matthias Sury
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Within the bioanalytical community, the use of blank matrix from preclinical animals for bioanalytical method validation and sample analysis is common practice and required in the context of guidelines for bioanalytical method validation. At the same time, its use has been challenged by the scientific community for decades, since there is ample scientific evidence to allow the use surrogate matrices for this purpose. Nevertheless, legacy and current regulatory thinking continues to be reluctant to allow the use of surrogate matrices in bioanalytical testing except for so-called rare matrices. As part of ongoing discussions in relation to the ICH M10 Guideline, the European Bioanalysis Forum re-challenges the unnecessary use of blank matrices from preclinical animals and believes that, as part of community responsibility and ethical standards and when supported by data, the use of surrogate matrices should become widely accepted. It is in this context that targeted experiments were conducted within the European Bioanalysis Forum to gather additional data and re-open the discussions with all involved and that it should become acceptable to use surrogate matrices wherever possible.

BioanalysisVol. 16(23-24)
Roche (Switzerland) (CH), Boehringer Ingelheim (Germany) (DE), Lundbeck (Denmark) (DK), Novo Nordisk (Denmark) (DK), ADK Hospital (MV), LabCorp (United States) (US), LMU Klinikum (DE), Bioanalytica (Switzerland) (CH), The Institute of Conservation (GB), Analytisches Laboratorium (DE), Almirall (Spain) (ES), Novo Nordisk (United Kingdom) (GB), Quotient Clinical (United Kingdom) (GB), Idorsia (Switzerland) (CH), Idera Pharmaceuticals (United States) (US), Aptuit (Italy) (IT), Nuvisan (Germany) (DE), Boehringer Ingelheim (Australia) (AU), Bayer (Germany) (DE), Evotec (United States) (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 28%
Biosimilars and Bioanalytical Methods
0.72
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.