Exploring the axial performance of protective sheathed rock bolts through large-scale testing

• Axial behavior of protective sheathed rock bolts was investigated. • Plastic sheath modifies the load transfer mechanism and performance of rock bolts. • Bond stress distribution along the encapsulation length was analyzed. • The failure pattern of protective sheathed rock bolts was examined. • Failure at the grout-sheath interface was found to be the primary failure mode. Understanding the axial load transfer mechanism of rock bolts under diverse conditions is essential for optimizing reinforcement in rock structures, advancing our comprehension of rock support, and facilitating the design of robust engineering solutions. This paper reports the outcomes of an extensive experimental investigation, focusing on the axial behavior of protective sheathed rock bolts employed in corrosive environments, assessed through pullout tests. Three distinct testing setups were designed to evaluate comprehensively the performance of these rock bolts in various scenarios. The results indicated that the failure characteristics and axial behaviors of sheathed rock bolts differ significantly from conventional counterparts. The findings revealed two primary failure modes in sheathed rock bolts: bolt rupture and slip at the grout-sheath interface, based on the testing arrangement and encapsulation length. The lack of adhesion and interlocking at the grout-sheath interface prevents shear stress at the bolt-grout interface from reaching its maximum potential strength, resulting in grout damage manifesting as circumferential cracks. This, in turn, initiates crack formation, reducing the system’s bond strength. Additionally, it causes slip at the grout-sheath interface to occur at lower pullout loads. It can be inferred that the inner surface of the plastic sheath lacks the necessary structural integrity to withstand high loads, significantly impacting bond stress distribution and failure modes. The results demonstrate that the protective sheath remains intact up to an axial displacement of 28 mm, irrespective of the testing configuration. Additionally, it was observed that the maximum bond stress at the bolt-grout interface falls within the range of 6–8.7 MPa, which is below the shear strength of the grout. Consequently, achieving failure at the bolt-grout interface is not feasible.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology
Published
2024-10-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2024.106157
Citations
6
Primary Topic
Geotechnical Engineering and Underground Structures
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.57
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Exploring the axial performance of protective sheathed rock bolts through large-scale testing

Kevin McDougall, Naj Aziz, Ali Mirzaghorbanali, Hadi Nourizadeh
6 citations
Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology
Geotechnical Engineering and Underground Structures
1.57
article

Exploring the axial performance of protective sheathed rock bolts through large-scale testing

Kevin McDougall, Naj Aziz, Ali Mirzaghorbanali, Hadi Nourizadeh
article en
6 citations

Abstract

• Axial behavior of protective sheathed rock bolts was investigated. • Plastic sheath modifies the load transfer mechanism and performance of rock bolts. • Bond stress distribution along the encapsulation length was analyzed. • The failure pattern of protective sheathed rock bolts was examined. • Failure at the grout-sheath interface was found to be the primary failure mode. Understanding the axial load transfer mechanism of rock bolts under diverse conditions is essential for optimizing reinforcement in rock structures, advancing our comprehension of rock support, and facilitating the design of robust engineering solutions. This paper reports the outcomes of an extensive experimental investigation, focusing on the axial behavior of protective sheathed rock bolts employed in corrosive environments, assessed through pullout tests. Three distinct testing setups were designed to evaluate comprehensively the performance of these rock bolts in various scenarios. The results indicated that the failure characteristics and axial behaviors of sheathed rock bolts differ significantly from conventional counterparts. The findings revealed two primary failure modes in sheathed rock bolts: bolt rupture and slip at the grout-sheath interface, based on the testing arrangement and encapsulation length. The lack of adhesion and interlocking at the grout-sheath interface prevents shear stress at the bolt-grout interface from reaching its maximum potential strength, resulting in grout damage manifesting as circumferential cracks. This, in turn, initiates crack formation, reducing the system’s bond strength. Additionally, it causes slip at the grout-sheath interface to occur at lower pullout loads. It can be inferred that the inner surface of the plastic sheath lacks the necessary structural integrity to withstand high loads, significantly impacting bond stress distribution and failure modes. The results demonstrate that the protective sheath remains intact up to an axial displacement of 28 mm, irrespective of the testing configuration. Additionally, it was observed that the maximum bond stress at the bolt-grout interface falls within the range of 6–8.7 MPa, which is below the shear strength of the grout. Consequently, achieving failure at the bolt-grout interface is not feasible.

Tunnelling and Underground Space TechnologyVol. 155
University of Southern Queensland (AU), University of Wollongong (AU)
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Geotechnical Engineering and Underground Structures
1.57
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.