Medical large language models are susceptible to targeted misinformation attacks

Large language models (LLMs) have broad medical knowledge and can reason about medical information across many domains, holding promising potential for diverse medical applications in the near future. In this study, we demonstrate a concerning vulnerability of LLMs in medicine. Through targeted manipulation of just 1.1% of the weights of the LLM, we can deliberately inject incorrect biomedical facts. The erroneous information is then propagated in the model's output while maintaining performance on other biomedical tasks. We validate our findings in a set of 1025 incorrect biomedical facts. This peculiar susceptibility raises serious security and trustworthiness concerns for the application of LLMs in healthcare settings. It accentuates the need for robust protective measures, thorough verification mechanisms, and stringent management of access to these models, ensuring their reliable and safe use in medical practice.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
npj Digital Medicine
Published
2024-10-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41746-024-01282-7
Citations
40
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.81

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Medical large language models are susceptible to targeted misinformation attacks

Christoph Haarburger, Keno K. Bressem, Daniel Truhn, Jens Kleesiek et al.
40 citations
npj Digital Medicine
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
4.81
article

Medical large language models are susceptible to targeted misinformation attacks

Christoph Haarburger, Keno K. Bressem, Daniel Truhn, Jens Kleesiek, Tianyu Han, Gustav Müller‐Franzes, Firas Khader, Christiane Katharina Kuhl, Sebastian Foersch, Jakob Nikolas Kather, Sven Nebelung, Tianci Wang
article en
40 citations

Abstract

Large language models (LLMs) have broad medical knowledge and can reason about medical information across many domains, holding promising potential for diverse medical applications in the near future. In this study, we demonstrate a concerning vulnerability of LLMs in medicine. Through targeted manipulation of just 1.1% of the weights of the LLM, we can deliberately inject incorrect biomedical facts. The erroneous information is then propagated in the model's output while maintaining performance on other biomedical tasks. We validate our findings in a set of 1025 incorrect biomedical facts. This peculiar susceptibility raises serious security and trustworthiness concerns for the application of LLMs in healthcare settings. It accentuates the need for robust protective measures, thorough verification mechanisms, and stringent management of access to these models, ensuring their reliable and safe use in medical practice.

npj Digital MedicineVol. 7(1)
Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz (DE), Heidelberg University (DE), University Hospital Heidelberg (DE), Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin (DE), University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz (DE), Fresenius (Germany) (DE), National Center for Tumor Diseases (DE), Universitätsklinikum Aachen (DE), Berlin Institute of Health at Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin (DE), Freie Universität Berlin (DE), Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin (DE), RWTH Aachen University (DE)
National Institute for Health and Care Research, European Commission, Deutscher Akademischer Austauschdienst, Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung, Bundesministerium für Gesundheit, Deutsche Krebshilfe, Gemeinsame Bundesausschuss, National Institutes of Health, HORIZON EUROPE Framework Programme, Leeds Biomedical Research Centre
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
4.81
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.