Fairness in artificial intelligence‐driven multi‐organ image segmentation

Abstract Fairness is an emerging consideration when assessing the segmentation performance of machine learning models across various demographic groups. During clinical decision‐making, an unfair segmentation model exhibits risks in that it can pose inappropriate diagnoses and unsuitable treatment plans for underrepresented demographic groups, resulting in severe consequences for patients and society. In medical artificial intelligence (AI), the fairness of multi‐organ segmentation is imperative to augment the integration of models into clinical practice. As the use of multi‐organ segmentation in medical image analysis expands, it is crucial to systematically examine fairness to ensure equitable segmentation performance across diverse patient populations and ensure health equity. However, comprehensive studies assessing the problem of fairness in multi‐organ segmentation remain lacking. This study aimed to provide an overview of the fairness problem in multi‐organ segmentation. We first define fairness and discuss the factors that lead to fairness problems such as individual fairness, group fairness, counterfactual fairness, and max–min fairness in multi‐organ segmentation, focusing mainly on datasets and models. We then present strategies to potentially improve fairness in multi‐organ segmentation. Additionally, we highlight the challenges and limitations of existing approaches and discuss future directions for improving the fairness of AI models for clinically oriented multi‐organ segmentation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
iRadiology
Published
2024-10-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/ird3.101
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.12

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Fairness in artificial intelligence‐driven multi‐organ image segmentation

Zian Wang, Mengting Sun, Shuo Wang, Meng Liu et al.
1 citations
iRadiology
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
0.12
article

Fairness in artificial intelligence‐driven multi‐organ image segmentation

Zian Wang, Mengting Sun, Shuo Wang, Meng Liu, Qing Li, Yizhe Zhang, Chengyan Wang, Longyu Sun, Qi Wang
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract Fairness is an emerging consideration when assessing the segmentation performance of machine learning models across various demographic groups. During clinical decision‐making, an unfair segmentation model exhibits risks in that it can pose inappropriate diagnoses and unsuitable treatment plans for underrepresented demographic groups, resulting in severe consequences for patients and society. In medical artificial intelligence (AI), the fairness of multi‐organ segmentation is imperative to augment the integration of models into clinical practice. As the use of multi‐organ segmentation in medical image analysis expands, it is crucial to systematically examine fairness to ensure equitable segmentation performance across diverse patient populations and ensure health equity. However, comprehensive studies assessing the problem of fairness in multi‐organ segmentation remain lacking. This study aimed to provide an overview of the fairness problem in multi‐organ segmentation. We first define fairness and discuss the factors that lead to fairness problems such as individual fairness, group fairness, counterfactual fairness, and max–min fairness in multi‐organ segmentation, focusing mainly on datasets and models. We then present strategies to potentially improve fairness in multi‐organ segmentation. Additionally, we highlight the challenges and limitations of existing approaches and discuss future directions for improving the fairness of AI models for clinically oriented multi‐organ segmentation.

iRadiologyVol. 2(6)
Shanghai Medical College of Fudan University (CN), Fudan University (CN), Nanjing University of Science and Technology (CN), Pudong Medical Center (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 47%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
0.12
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.