Risk of Malignancy Index Assessment in Pre and Postmenopausal Women with Adnexal Masses: A Cross-Sectional Study

Background: Adnexal mass is a common presentation in gynecological settings. Differentiation between benign and malignant tumors is crucial for deciding the proper place and type of treatment. The RMI is considered a good and reliable tool in pre-operative differentiation of ovarian tumors, but limited work has been done on this tool in low-resource settings. Objective: To assess the diagnostic accuracy of Risk of malignancy index in differentiating benign from malignant ovarian tumors. Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted in Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology at a Teaching Hospital, Lahore. Eighty females between 30-80 years, admitted with adnexal mass in the Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology at Central Park Teaching Hospital, Lahore from October 1st to 30th September, 2023 were enrolled. RMI was calculated and findings were compared with histopathology. Results: Among enrolled 80 females with adnexal mass the mean age of females was 43.70 ± 8.21 years. The mean BMI was 30.60 ± 5.68 kg/m2. The mean duration of post-menopausal bleeding was 14.50 ± 6.22 months. The mean RMI of females was 212.95 ± 159.76. The Sensitivity of RMI was 100%, specificity was 90.6%, PPV was 72.7%, NPV was 100%, and diagnostic accuracy was 92.5% taking histopathological findings as gold standard. Conclusion: Thus, RMI is found to be a reliable tool for the diagnosis of ovarian malignancy in females with suspicious adnexal mass.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Annals of King Edward Medical University
Published
2024-09-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.21649/akemu.v30i3.5539
Primary Topic
Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Risk of Malignancy Index Assessment in Pre and Postmenopausal Women with Adnexal Masses: A Cross-Sectional Study

Rubeena Badar, Rubina Naurin, Tehmina Zafar, Sobia Zafar et al.
Annals of King Edward Medical University
Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment
article

Risk of Malignancy Index Assessment in Pre and Postmenopausal Women with Adnexal Masses: A Cross-Sectional Study

Rubeena Badar, Rubina Naurin, Tehmina Zafar, Sobia Zafar, Rozina Naurin
article en

Abstract

Background: Adnexal mass is a common presentation in gynecological settings. Differentiation between benign and malignant tumors is crucial for deciding the proper place and type of treatment. The RMI is considered a good and reliable tool in pre-operative differentiation of ovarian tumors, but limited work has been done on this tool in low-resource settings. Objective: To assess the diagnostic accuracy of Risk of malignancy index in differentiating benign from malignant ovarian tumors. Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted in Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology at a Teaching Hospital, Lahore. Eighty females between 30-80 years, admitted with adnexal mass in the Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology at Central Park Teaching Hospital, Lahore from October 1st to 30th September, 2023 were enrolled. RMI was calculated and findings were compared with histopathology. Results: Among enrolled 80 females with adnexal mass the mean age of females was 43.70 ± 8.21 years. The mean BMI was 30.60 ± 5.68 kg/m2. The mean duration of post-menopausal bleeding was 14.50 ± 6.22 months. The mean RMI of females was 212.95 ± 159.76. The Sensitivity of RMI was 100%, specificity was 90.6%, PPV was 72.7%, NPV was 100%, and diagnostic accuracy was 92.5% taking histopathological findings as gold standard. Conclusion: Thus, RMI is found to be a reliable tool for the diagnosis of ovarian malignancy in females with suspicious adnexal mass.

Annals of King Edward Medical UniversityVol. 30(3)
Services Institute of Medical Sciences (PK), University of Central Punjab (PK), Corniche Hospital (AE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 71%
Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.