SRAM Single Bit Cell Soft Failure and Nanoprobing Methods

Abstract SRAM is often chosen to be the process qualification vehicle during technology development or yield learning vehicle during product manufacturing, and consequently failure analysis of SRAM is the main feedback for process improvement and yield learning. The most common SRAM failure is single bit cell failure. Although its location can be precisely localized by functional test and the defect causing the failure is within the failing bit cell, its failure analysis becomes more and more challenging in advanced technology nodes. As semiconductor technology continuously scales down, SRAM bit cell size and power supply voltage decrease, resulting in increased transistor strength variation and mismatch. SRAM single bit cell soft failures have become more and more common. For such a failure, its defect is usually subtle or even there is not physical defect at most cases. The soft failure is just due to transistor parameter variation. To evaluate the single bit cell soft failure and identify its root cause, electrical nano-probing is an indispensable measure. In this paper, we will first describe the operation of a 6-Transistor (6-T) SRAM single bit cell and three different types of single bit cell soft failures, then discuss the two electrical nano-probing methods for the SRAM single bit cell soft failure.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Proceedings - International Symposium for Testing and Failure Analysis
Published
2024-10-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.31399/asm.cp.istfa2024p0028
Primary Topic
Integrated Circuits and Semiconductor Failure Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

SRAM Single Bit Cell Soft Failure and Nanoprobing Methods

Michael P. Tenney, Dave Albert, Zhigang Song, Larry Fischer
Proceedings - International Symposium for Testing and Failure Analysis
Integrated Circuits and Semiconductor Failure Analysis
article

SRAM Single Bit Cell Soft Failure and Nanoprobing Methods

Michael P. Tenney, Dave Albert, Zhigang Song, Larry Fischer
article en

Abstract

Abstract SRAM is often chosen to be the process qualification vehicle during technology development or yield learning vehicle during product manufacturing, and consequently failure analysis of SRAM is the main feedback for process improvement and yield learning. The most common SRAM failure is single bit cell failure. Although its location can be precisely localized by functional test and the defect causing the failure is within the failing bit cell, its failure analysis becomes more and more challenging in advanced technology nodes. As semiconductor technology continuously scales down, SRAM bit cell size and power supply voltage decrease, resulting in increased transistor strength variation and mismatch. SRAM single bit cell soft failures have become more and more common. For such a failure, its defect is usually subtle or even there is not physical defect at most cases. The soft failure is just due to transistor parameter variation. To evaluate the single bit cell soft failure and identify its root cause, electrical nano-probing is an indispensable measure. In this paper, we will first describe the operation of a 6-Transistor (6-T) SRAM single bit cell and three different types of single bit cell soft failures, then discuss the two electrical nano-probing methods for the SRAM single bit cell soft failure.

Proceedings - International Symposium for Testing and Failure AnalysisVol. 84918
IBM (United States) (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 84%
Integrated Circuits and Semiconductor Failure Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

SRAM Single Bit Cell Soft Failure and Nanoprobing Methods — Michael P. Tenney, Dave Albert, et al. · Proceedings - International Symposium for Testing and Failure Analysis (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS