Fatigue Analysis on a Newly Designed Hip Implant with Finite Element Method

This study used Finite Element Analysis (FEA) and Reverse Engineering (RE) methods to assess the fatigue performance of an originally designed cementless hip implant. The implant prototype was initially scanned using 3D scanning technology, and a finite element model was created. The implant was analyzed under dynamic loads for six different biomaterials commonly used, namely Ti-6Al-4V (Grade5), ASTM F3046 (Ti-3Al-2.5V), ASTM F75 (CoCr), ASTM F562(MP35N), ASTM F136(Ti6Al4V ELI), ASTM F67 (Ti Grade 4), and the fatigue life was evaluated. The results showed that the ASTM F75 (CoCr) implant had the highest stress and the ASTM F67 (Ti Grade 4) implant had the lowest stress. Also, Ti6Al4V (Grade 5) implant is more resistant to fatigue than their counterparts made from ASTM F75 (CoCr), ASTM F136 (Ti6Al4V ELI) and ASTM 3046 (Ti-3Al-2.5V).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Engineering and Innovative Research
Published
2024-10-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.47933/ijeir.1540604
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.57
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Fatigue Analysis on a Newly Designed Hip Implant with Finite Element Method

Gülhan İnce, Fatih Kaya
1 citations
International Journal of Engineering and Innovative Research
Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty
0.57
article

Fatigue Analysis on a Newly Designed Hip Implant with Finite Element Method

Gülhan İnce, Fatih Kaya
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This study used Finite Element Analysis (FEA) and Reverse Engineering (RE) methods to assess the fatigue performance of an originally designed cementless hip implant. The implant prototype was initially scanned using 3D scanning technology, and a finite element model was created. The implant was analyzed under dynamic loads for six different biomaterials commonly used, namely Ti-6Al-4V (Grade5), ASTM F3046 (Ti-3Al-2.5V), ASTM F75 (CoCr), ASTM F562(MP35N), ASTM F136(Ti6Al4V ELI), ASTM F67 (Ti Grade 4), and the fatigue life was evaluated. The results showed that the ASTM F75 (CoCr) implant had the highest stress and the ASTM F67 (Ti Grade 4) implant had the lowest stress. Also, Ti6Al4V (Grade 5) implant is more resistant to fatigue than their counterparts made from ASTM F75 (CoCr), ASTM F136 (Ti6Al4V ELI) and ASTM 3046 (Ti-3Al-2.5V).

International Journal of Engineering and Innovative ResearchVol. 6(3)
Burdur Mehmet Akif Ersoy Üniversitesi (TR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 28%
Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty
0.57
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.