Does working memory training in children need to be adaptive? A randomized controlled trial

Most cognitive training programs are adaptive, despite limited direct evidence that this maximizes children's outcomes. This randomized controlled trial evaluated working memory training with difficulty of activities presented using adaptive, self-select, or stepwise compared with an active control. At baseline, immediately, and 6-months post-intervention, 201 Australian primary school children (101 males, 7-11 years) completed working memory tests (near and intermediate transfer) and the Raven's Standard Progressive Matrices, and caregivers completed the attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder-Rating Scale-5 (far transfer). The intervention comprised ten 20-min sessions delivered in class. For each training condition, compared with the active control, there was no evidence of transfer immediately or 6-months post-intervention (negligible to small effects). This trial provides no evidence that adaptive working memory training maximizes children's outcomes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Child Development
Published
2024-10-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.14180
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Cognitive Abilities and Testing
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.54

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Does working memory training in children need to be adaptive? A randomized controlled trial

Susan E. Gathercole, Joshua F. Wiley, Regine Cassandra Lau, Megan M. Spencer‐Smith et al.
5 citations
Child Development
Cognitive Abilities and Testing
2.54
article

Does working memory training in children need to be adaptive? A randomized controlled trial

Susan E. Gathercole, Joshua F. Wiley, Regine Cassandra Lau, Megan M. Spencer‐Smith, Peter J. Anderson
article en
5 citations

Abstract

Most cognitive training programs are adaptive, despite limited direct evidence that this maximizes children's outcomes. This randomized controlled trial evaluated working memory training with difficulty of activities presented using adaptive, self-select, or stepwise compared with an active control. At baseline, immediately, and 6-months post-intervention, 201 Australian primary school children (101 males, 7-11 years) completed working memory tests (near and intermediate transfer) and the Raven's Standard Progressive Matrices, and caregivers completed the attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder-Rating Scale-5 (far transfer). The intervention comprised ten 20-min sessions delivered in class. For each training condition, compared with the active control, there was no evidence of transfer immediately or 6-months post-intervention (negligible to small effects). This trial provides no evidence that adaptive working memory training maximizes children's outcomes.

Child DevelopmentVol. 96(2)
Children's Hospital of Orange County (US), MRC Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit (GB), University of California, Irvine (US), University of Cambridge (GB), Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre (AU), Victorian Clinical Genetics Services (AU), Murdoch Children's Research Institute (AU), Monash University (AU)
Tan Kah Kee Foundation, Medical Research Council, National Health and Medical Research Council, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Cognitive Abilities and Testing
2.54
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.