Exploring prediction accuracy for optimal taxi times in airport operations using various machine learning models

Understanding delay conditions and making accurate predictions are essential for optimizing turnaround and taxi times, which in turn reduces fuel consumption and lowers CO 2 emissions in airport operations. However, while existing research has explored the impact of various prediction models on airport operations, it often overlooks the performance of Collaborative Decision Making (CDM) variables when discussing delay conditions. The implementation of CDM at major European airports has led to a milestone-based approach within airport operations, particularly in the turnaround operations, segmenting these operations with unique features. The purpose of this paper is to systematically investigate the efficacy of various machine learning techniques, such as linear regression, regression trees, random forests, elastic nets, and multi-layer perceptrons (MLP), in accurately predicting delay categories within the CDM framework. For this purpose, we analyzed CDM operational data from Madrid Airport, with at least 166,185 flight observations. Our findings illustrate a training methodology on how different models vary in prediction accuracy when applied to CDM operational data. We applied the SHAP (SHapley Additive exPlanations) method for feature importance analysis of all our independent variables to interpret the output of our machine learning models. Our results indicate that linear regression and elastic nets are the most effective machine learning models for achieving high prediction accuracy within the CDM framework. To test their robustness, we extended the analysis with predictions for better schedule times for taxi times on arrival and depature for selected runways using a different dataset. Our results contribute by showcasing a training methodology, highlighting how elastic net model as the best-performing model can be adopted for turnaround operations. In conclusion, we discuss the implications of our results for runway demand policies and use of airport resources such as gate & runaway allocation. • Collaborative Decision Making (CDM) employs a milestone-based approach that introduces new performance indicators. • Existing research often overlooks CDM features when discussing delay conditions with machine learning. • This study investigates how five distinct machine learning methods. • Subsequently, we expanded our analysis to predict taxi times using a different dataset. • We conclude the paper by discussing the implications of our findings.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Air Transport Management
Published
2024-10-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jairtraman.2024.102684
Citations
8
Primary Topic
Air Traffic Management and Optimization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
10.39
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Exploring prediction accuracy for optimal taxi times in airport operations using various machine learning models

Kaveh Amouzgar, Amos H.C. Ng, Simon Okwir
8 citations
Journal of Air Transport Management
Air Traffic Management and Optimization
10.39
article

Exploring prediction accuracy for optimal taxi times in airport operations using various machine learning models

Kaveh Amouzgar, Amos H.C. Ng, Simon Okwir
article en
8 citations

Abstract

Understanding delay conditions and making accurate predictions are essential for optimizing turnaround and taxi times, which in turn reduces fuel consumption and lowers CO 2 emissions in airport operations. However, while existing research has explored the impact of various prediction models on airport operations, it often overlooks the performance of Collaborative Decision Making (CDM) variables when discussing delay conditions. The implementation of CDM at major European airports has led to a milestone-based approach within airport operations, particularly in the turnaround operations, segmenting these operations with unique features. The purpose of this paper is to systematically investigate the efficacy of various machine learning techniques, such as linear regression, regression trees, random forests, elastic nets, and multi-layer perceptrons (MLP), in accurately predicting delay categories within the CDM framework. For this purpose, we analyzed CDM operational data from Madrid Airport, with at least 166,185 flight observations. Our findings illustrate a training methodology on how different models vary in prediction accuracy when applied to CDM operational data. We applied the SHAP (SHapley Additive exPlanations) method for feature importance analysis of all our independent variables to interpret the output of our machine learning models. Our results indicate that linear regression and elastic nets are the most effective machine learning models for achieving high prediction accuracy within the CDM framework. To test their robustness, we extended the analysis with predictions for better schedule times for taxi times on arrival and depature for selected runways using a different dataset. Our results contribute by showcasing a training methodology, highlighting how elastic net model as the best-performing model can be adopted for turnaround operations. In conclusion, we discuss the implications of our results for runway demand policies and use of airport resources such as gate & runaway allocation. • Collaborative Decision Making (CDM) employs a milestone-based approach that introduces new performance indicators. • Existing research often overlooks CDM features when discussing delay conditions with machine learning. • This study investigates how five distinct machine learning methods. • Subsequently, we expanded our analysis to predict taxi times using a different dataset. • We conclude the paper by discussing the implications of our findings.

Journal of Air Transport ManagementVol. 122
Uppsala University (SE), University of Skövde (SE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Air Traffic Management and Optimization
10.39
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.