Religious Slaughter and Supranational Jurisprudence in the Context of Animal Welfare Science

Within the European socio-cultural landscape, which is increasingly attuned to animal welfare concerns and characterized by growing multiculturalism, ritual slaughter has become a subject of considerable debate due to its legal, economic, and health implications. This debate is increasingly fueled by interventions by judicial bodies that, not infrequently, have filled protection gaps in legislation on the relationship between human rights and the treatment of animals. In this review, the authors aim to describe the evolutionary path of supranational jurisprudence in the case of religious slaughter, focusing on the most recent animal welfare decision rendered by the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) on 13 February 2024. This innovative judgement, in line with other precedents, indicates the orientation of the international and European law, which, driven by public morality, is increasingly characterized by the compression of human rights in favor of animal interests.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Laws
Published
2024-10-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/laws13060065
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Halal products and consumer behavior
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.13

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Religious Slaughter and Supranational Jurisprudence in the Context of Animal Welfare Science

Francesco Emanuele Celentano, Giancarlo Bozzo, Vito Conforti, Michela Maria Dimuccio et al.
1 citations
Laws
Halal products and consumer behavior
1.13
article

Religious Slaughter and Supranational Jurisprudence in the Context of Animal Welfare Science

Francesco Emanuele Celentano, Giancarlo Bozzo, Vito Conforti, Michela Maria Dimuccio, Gaetano Vitale Celano, Fabrizio Ceci
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Within the European socio-cultural landscape, which is increasingly attuned to animal welfare concerns and characterized by growing multiculturalism, ritual slaughter has become a subject of considerable debate due to its legal, economic, and health implications. This debate is increasingly fueled by interventions by judicial bodies that, not infrequently, have filled protection gaps in legislation on the relationship between human rights and the treatment of animals. In this review, the authors aim to describe the evolutionary path of supranational jurisprudence in the case of religious slaughter, focusing on the most recent animal welfare decision rendered by the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) on 13 February 2024. This innovative judgement, in line with other precedents, indicates the orientation of the international and European law, which, driven by public morality, is increasingly characterized by the compression of human rights in favor of animal interests.

LawsVol. 13(6)
University of Bari Aldo Moro (IT)
European Commission, European Education and Culture Executive Agency, Education, Audiovisual and Culture Executive Agency
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Halal products and consumer behavior
1.13
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.