Peer-Driven Intervention for Care Coordination and Adherence Promotion for Obstructive Sleep Apnea: A Randomized, Parallel-Group Clinical Trial

<b>Rationale:</b> Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is a common condition that is usually treated by continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) therapy, but poor adherence is common and is associated with worse patient outcomes and experiences. Patient satisfaction is increasingly adopted as a quality indicator by healthcare systems. <b>Objectives:</b> We tested the hypothesis that peer-driven intervention effected through an interactive voice response (IVR) system leads to better patient satisfaction (primary outcome), care coordination, and CPAP adherence than active control. <b>Methods:</b> We performed a 6-month randomized, parallel-group, controlled trial with CPAP-naive patients recruited from four centers and CPAP-adherent patients who were trained to be mentors delivering support through an IVR system. <b>Measurements and Main Results:</b> In 263 patients, intention-to-treat analysis of global satisfaction for sleep-specific services was better in the intervention group (4.57 ± 0.71 Likert scale score; mean ± SD) than in the active-control group (4.10 ± 1.13; <i>P</i> < 0.001). CPAP adherence was greater in the intervention group (4.5 ± 0.2 h/night; 62.0% ± 3.0% of nights >4 h use) versus the active-control group (3.7 ± 0.2 h/night; 51.4% ± 3.0% of nights >4 h use; <i>P</i> = 0.014 and <i>P</i> = 0.023). When compared with the active-control group, the Patient Assessment of Chronic Illness Care rating was moderately increased by an adjusted difference of 0.33 ± 0.12 (<i>P</i> = 0.009), Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Provider and Systems rating was not different (adjusted difference, 0.46 ± 0.26; <i>P</i> = 0.076), and Client Perception of Coordination Questionnaire was mildly better in the intervention group (adjusted difference, 0.15 ± 0.07; <i>P</i> = 0.035). <b>Conclusions:</b> Patient satisfaction with care delivery, CPAP adherence, and care coordination were improved by peer-driven intervention through an IVR system. New payor policies compensating peer support may enable implementation of this approach. Clinical trial registered with www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT02056002).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine
Published
2024-10-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1164/rccm.202309-1594oc
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Obstructive Sleep Apnea Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.63

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Peer-Driven Intervention for Care Coordination and Adherence Promotion for Obstructive Sleep Apnea: A Randomized, Parallel-Group Clinical Trial

Stefano Guerra, Sairam Parthasarathy, Michael A. Grandner, Stuart F. Quan et al.
5 citations
American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine
Obstructive Sleep Apnea Research
1.63
article

Peer-Driven Intervention for Care Coordination and Adherence Promotion for Obstructive Sleep Apnea: A Randomized, Parallel-Group Clinical Trial

Stefano Guerra, Sairam Parthasarathy, Michael A. Grandner, Stuart F. Quan, Daniel Combs, Patricia L. Haynes, Christopher S. Wendel
article en
5 citations

Abstract

<b>Rationale:</b> Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is a common condition that is usually treated by continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) therapy, but poor adherence is common and is associated with worse patient outcomes and experiences. Patient satisfaction is increasingly adopted as a quality indicator by healthcare systems. <b>Objectives:</b> We tested the hypothesis that peer-driven intervention effected through an interactive voice response (IVR) system leads to better patient satisfaction (primary outcome), care coordination, and CPAP adherence than active control. <b>Methods:</b> We performed a 6-month randomized, parallel-group, controlled trial with CPAP-naive patients recruited from four centers and CPAP-adherent patients who were trained to be mentors delivering support through an IVR system. <b>Measurements and Main Results:</b> In 263 patients, intention-to-treat analysis of global satisfaction for sleep-specific services was better in the intervention group (4.57 ± 0.71 Likert scale score; mean ± SD) than in the active-control group (4.10 ± 1.13; <i>P</i> < 0.001). CPAP adherence was greater in the intervention group (4.5 ± 0.2 h/night; 62.0% ± 3.0% of nights >4 h use) versus the active-control group (3.7 ± 0.2 h/night; 51.4% ± 3.0% of nights >4 h use; <i>P</i> = 0.014 and <i>P</i> = 0.023). When compared with the active-control group, the Patient Assessment of Chronic Illness Care rating was moderately increased by an adjusted difference of 0.33 ± 0.12 (<i>P</i> = 0.009), Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Provider and Systems rating was not different (adjusted difference, 0.46 ± 0.26; <i>P</i> = 0.076), and Client Perception of Coordination Questionnaire was mildly better in the intervention group (adjusted difference, 0.15 ± 0.07; <i>P</i> = 0.035). <b>Conclusions:</b> Patient satisfaction with care delivery, CPAP adherence, and care coordination were improved by peer-driven intervention through an IVR system. New payor policies compensating peer support may enable implementation of this approach. Clinical trial registered with www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT02056002).

American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care MedicineVol. 211(2)
Brigham and Women's Hospital (US), Harvard University (US), University of Arizona (US), Circadian (United States) (US), Dermatology Research Center (US), Canadian Sleep & Circadian Network (CA)
Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Obstructive Sleep Apnea Research
1.63
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.