Filtering Techniques Comparison in Gait Analysis using Depth Cameras

During the gait analysis using depth cameras, a filtering process is applied before procesing the signals, in order to reduce noise, fill null data and improve the gait parameters extraction. Such filtering process may alter the signal in a non desirable way and we consider important to verify if the processing we are using is adequate. It means that reduces enough noise without altering the esential parameters of the signal. For such task, we use two algorithms and compare both, in order to decide which one is the most reliable for the gait variables extraction with high confidence. In this paper, we compare both methods (interpolation and mean average) using a Pearson correlation and continuous concordance test between the captured signals before filtering and after filtering for each filter type. We found that both filtering methods produce similar results and are reliable.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-08-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/colcom62950.2024.10720285
Primary Topic
Gait Recognition and Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Filtering Techniques Comparison in Gait Analysis using Depth Cameras

Jorge Orozco, Juan Tello, Beatriz Muñoz, Patricia Madriñán et al.
Gait Recognition and Analysis
article

Filtering Techniques Comparison in Gait Analysis using Depth Cameras

Jorge Orozco, Juan Tello, Beatriz Muñoz, Patricia Madriñán, A. C., Nicolás J. Salazar E
article en

Abstract

During the gait analysis using depth cameras, a filtering process is applied before procesing the signals, in order to reduce noise, fill null data and improve the gait parameters extraction. Such filtering process may alter the signal in a non desirable way and we consider important to verify if the processing we are using is adequate. It means that reduces enough noise without altering the esential parameters of the signal. For such task, we use two algorithms and compare both, in order to decide which one is the most reliable for the gait variables extraction with high confidence. In this paper, we compare both methods (interpolation and mean average) using a Pearson correlation and continuous concordance test between the captured signals before filtering and after filtering for each filter type. We found that both filtering methods produce similar results and are reliable.

Fundación Valle del Lili (CO), Icesi University (CO)
Openalex Percentile: Top 83%
Gait Recognition and Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Filtering Techniques Comparison in Gait Analysis using Depth Cameras — Jorge Orozco, Juan Tello, et al. · (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS