Empirical Tight-Binding Parameterizations for Accurate Heterostructure and Alloy Calculations

Empirical tight-binding is a valuable and reliable tool for the calculation of electronic and optical properties in semiconductor heterostructures and alloys. It has been applied in many contexts, ranging from inorganic semiconductors like arsenides, antimonides, nitrides and their alloys to 2D materials and hybrid perovskites. Here we present recent activities in development and application of empirical tight-binding, in particular regarding disordered alloys. We show some limitations of the most used schemes, and how they can be overcome by more recent parameterizations, and we introduce an alternative machine-learning based parameterization scheme.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-09-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/nusod62083.2024.10723707
Primary Topic
Machine Learning in Materials Science
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Empirical Tight-Binding Parameterizations for Accurate Heterostructure and Alloy Calculations

Matthias Auf der Maur, Alessia Di Vito, Anh‐Luan Phan, Daniele Soccodato et al.
Machine Learning in Materials Science
article

Empirical Tight-Binding Parameterizations for Accurate Heterostructure and Alloy Calculations

Matthias Auf der Maur, Alessia Di Vito, Anh‐Luan Phan, Daniele Soccodato, Alessandro Pecchia
article en

Abstract

Empirical tight-binding is a valuable and reliable tool for the calculation of electronic and optical properties in semiconductor heterostructures and alloys. It has been applied in many contexts, ranging from inorganic semiconductors like arsenides, antimonides, nitrides and their alloys to 2D materials and hybrid perovskites. Here we present recent activities in development and application of empirical tight-binding, in particular regarding disordered alloys. We show some limitations of the most used schemes, and how they can be overcome by more recent parameterizations, and we introduce an alternative machine-learning based parameterization scheme.

University of Rome Tor Vergata (IT), Institute of Structure of Matter (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 88%
Machine Learning in Materials Science
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.