Criteria for urban streets suitability for car-free day initiatives

• Delphi study establishes criteria for selecting streets for car-free day programs. • Forty-six criteria identified across six categories with input from twenty expert panelists. • Highest-ranked categories were mobility and accessibility, and environment, health and safety. • Panelists reached consensus on fourty criteria, influencing urban planning and policy. • Results provide a scientific basis to improve road safety and mobility in growing cities. Cities with a growing population and complexity face urban crises related to road safety and mobility. Governments and collaborative stakeholders are introducing car-free day programs to address these challenges. In this study, a scientific criterion to identify suitable streets for such programs was established through a three-round Delphi study. The study involved twenty panelists from academia, city governments, international and local organizations, and freelance consultants. The panelists identified forty-six criteria clustered into six categories through open-ended and close-ended rounds, desk research, and insights from a car-free day workshop. The panelists reached a consensus on all categories and forty items. According to the results, the panelists reached a “good agreement” on three categories, environment, health & safety, land use & roadside, and mobility & accessibility; a “moderate agreement” on the three categories, namely, categories, geometry & functionality, and policy & governance; and a “weak” agreement on the one object, namely, social & economic. The relative importance index indicated that the two categories, “mobility and accessibility” and “environment, health and safety”, were considered the most important. The study suggests that these findings can potentially influence urban planning and transportation policies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives
Published
2024-10-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trip.2024.101197
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Urban Transport and Accessibility
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.05
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Criteria for urban streets suitability for car-free day initiatives

Anteneh Afework Mekonnen
3 citations
Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives
Urban Transport and Accessibility
2.05
article

Criteria for urban streets suitability for car-free day initiatives

Anteneh Afework Mekonnen
article en
3 citations

Abstract

• Delphi study establishes criteria for selecting streets for car-free day programs. • Forty-six criteria identified across six categories with input from twenty expert panelists. • Highest-ranked categories were mobility and accessibility, and environment, health and safety. • Panelists reached consensus on fourty criteria, influencing urban planning and policy. • Results provide a scientific basis to improve road safety and mobility in growing cities. Cities with a growing population and complexity face urban crises related to road safety and mobility. Governments and collaborative stakeholders are introducing car-free day programs to address these challenges. In this study, a scientific criterion to identify suitable streets for such programs was established through a three-round Delphi study. The study involved twenty panelists from academia, city governments, international and local organizations, and freelance consultants. The panelists identified forty-six criteria clustered into six categories through open-ended and close-ended rounds, desk research, and insights from a car-free day workshop. The panelists reached a consensus on all categories and forty items. According to the results, the panelists reached a “good agreement” on three categories, environment, health & safety, land use & roadside, and mobility & accessibility; a “moderate agreement” on the three categories, namely, categories, geometry & functionality, and policy & governance; and a “weak” agreement on the one object, namely, social & economic. The relative importance index indicated that the two categories, “mobility and accessibility” and “environment, health and safety”, were considered the most important. The study suggests that these findings can potentially influence urban planning and transportation policies.

Transportation Research Interdisciplinary PerspectivesVol. 28
Addis Ababa Science and Technology University (ET)
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Urban Transport and Accessibility
2.05
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Criteria for urban streets suitability for car-free day initiatives — Anteneh Afework Mekonnen · Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS