Association of gut microbiota with critical pneumonia: A two-sample Mendelian randomization study

This study investigated the causal effect of gut microbiota on critical pneumonia. Data came from a large-scale gut microbiota data set (n = 18,340) and the critical pneumonia genome-wide genotyping array (cases n = 2758 and controls n = 42,8607). Inverse variance weighting was used as the primary Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis method. Weighted median, MR-Egger, simple model, weighted model, and MR-Egger, were used to evaluate robustness. Sensitivity analysis used Cochran Q test, MR-Egger intercept test, and MR-PRESSO. For critical pneumonia, inverse variance weighting estimates suggested that Class Verrucomicrobiae (OR = 0.415; 95% CI: 0.207, 0.833; P = .013), Family Verrucomicrobiaceae (OR = 0.415; 95% CI: 0.207, 0.833; P = .013), Genus Akkermansia (OR = 0.415; 95% CI: 0.207, 0.833; P = .013), Genus LachnospiraceaeFCS020group (OR = 0.449; 95% CI: 0.230, 0.890; P = .021), Genus Parasutterella (OR = 0.466; 95% CI: 0.233, 0.929; P = .030), Genus Prevotella7 (OR = 0.645; 95% CI: 0.432, 0.960; P = .031), Order Verrucomicrobiales (OR = 0.415; 95% CI: 0.207, 0.833; P = .013), and Phylum Cyanobacteria (OR = 0.510; 95% CI: 0.272, 0.956; P = .036) had a reduced risk, while Family Enterobacteriaceae (OR = 2.746; 95% CI: 1.008, 7.474; P = .048), Genus RuminococcaceaeUCG003 (OR = 2.811; 95% CI: 1.349, 5.851; P = .006) and Order Enterobacteriales (OR = 2.746; 95% CI: 1.008, 7.474; P = .048) were associated with an increased risk. Sensitivity analyses confirmed that the aforementioned correlations were robust.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Medicine
Published
2024-10-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/md.0000000000039677
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Gut microbiota and health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.47

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Association of gut microbiota with critical pneumonia: A two-sample Mendelian randomization study

Ni Zhang, Hanwei Ma, Xuan Wu, Xiaonan Xu et al.
2 citations
Medicine
Gut microbiota and health
0.47
article

Association of gut microbiota with critical pneumonia: A two-sample Mendelian randomization study

Ni Zhang, Hanwei Ma, Xuan Wu, Xiaonan Xu, Peirun Wu, Yan Li, Dan Li, Yuanxiao Li, Minhua Fang
article en
2 citations

Abstract

This study investigated the causal effect of gut microbiota on critical pneumonia. Data came from a large-scale gut microbiota data set (n = 18,340) and the critical pneumonia genome-wide genotyping array (cases n = 2758 and controls n = 42,8607). Inverse variance weighting was used as the primary Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis method. Weighted median, MR-Egger, simple model, weighted model, and MR-Egger, were used to evaluate robustness. Sensitivity analysis used Cochran Q test, MR-Egger intercept test, and MR-PRESSO. For critical pneumonia, inverse variance weighting estimates suggested that Class Verrucomicrobiae (OR = 0.415; 95% CI: 0.207, 0.833; P = .013), Family Verrucomicrobiaceae (OR = 0.415; 95% CI: 0.207, 0.833; P = .013), Genus Akkermansia (OR = 0.415; 95% CI: 0.207, 0.833; P = .013), Genus LachnospiraceaeFCS020group (OR = 0.449; 95% CI: 0.230, 0.890; P = .021), Genus Parasutterella (OR = 0.466; 95% CI: 0.233, 0.929; P = .030), Genus Prevotella7 (OR = 0.645; 95% CI: 0.432, 0.960; P = .031), Order Verrucomicrobiales (OR = 0.415; 95% CI: 0.207, 0.833; P = .013), and Phylum Cyanobacteria (OR = 0.510; 95% CI: 0.272, 0.956; P = .036) had a reduced risk, while Family Enterobacteriaceae (OR = 2.746; 95% CI: 1.008, 7.474; P = .048), Genus RuminococcaceaeUCG003 (OR = 2.811; 95% CI: 1.349, 5.851; P = .006) and Order Enterobacteriales (OR = 2.746; 95% CI: 1.008, 7.474; P = .048) were associated with an increased risk. Sensitivity analyses confirmed that the aforementioned correlations were robust.

MedicineVol. 103(42)
Lanzhou University Second Hospital (CN), Lanzhou University (CN)
Lanzhou University
Openalex Percentile: Top 34%
Gut microbiota and health
0.47
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.