The relationship between the Prognostic Nutritional Index and lymphovascular and perineural invasion of the tumor in patients diagnosed with gastric cancer, and its effect on overall survival

A low Prognostic Nutritional Index (PNI) value, lymphovascular invasion (LVI), and perineural invasion (PeNI) have been identified as indicators of poor prognosis for many malignancies. We aimed to evaluate the relationship between PNI and LVI/PeNI, their prognostic significance, and their effect on overall survival in gastric cancer patients who underwent curative gastrectomy. A cutoff value of 39.8 was taken for the PNI, and PNI < 39.8 was defined as moderate to severe malnutrition. Patients were grouped as PNI-low (PNI < 39.8) and PNI-high (PNI ≥ 39.8). Paraffin-embedded tissue sections of surgical specimens were used to evaluate PeNI as defined by previously reported criteria. The study included 270 patients with ages ranging from 23 to 90 years. The mean PNI was calculated as 39.8 ± 6.35. PeNI was detected in 232 patients (85.93%), and LVI was identified in 248 patients (91.85%). It was observed that the PNI value of patients with an expired status in the PNI < 39.8 group was lower compared to those who survived, and in patients with PNI > 39.8, those without PeNI had better survival. The presence of PeNI in patients with PNI > 39.8 increased the mortality risk by 2.088 units, while in patients with PNI > 39.8, it was found that those without LVI had better survival, and the presence of LVI increased the mortality risk by 3.171 units. Mortality developed in 166 patients (61.48%) during the five-year follow-up period. The five-year overall survival was found to be 31.02 ± 21.73 months. In patients with gastric cancer, the PNI, LVI, and PeNI are independent prognostic factors for overall survival in postoperative patients. A low PNI score is an inherently poor prognostic factor. In patients with a high PNI score, the presence of positive LVI and PeNI negatively impacts survival. We found that in patients with a low PNI, the rates of PeNI and LVI are higher compared to those with a high PNI, and this significantly affects mortality.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Medicine
Published
2024-10-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/md.0000000000040087
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.26
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The relationship between the Prognostic Nutritional Index and lymphovascular and perineural invasion of the tumor in patients diagnosed with gastric cancer, and its effect on overall survival

Pırıltı Özcan, Mehmet Sinan Çarkman
3 citations
Medicine
Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes
1.26
article

The relationship between the Prognostic Nutritional Index and lymphovascular and perineural invasion of the tumor in patients diagnosed with gastric cancer, and its effect on overall survival

Pırıltı Özcan, Mehmet Sinan Çarkman
article en
3 citations

Abstract

A low Prognostic Nutritional Index (PNI) value, lymphovascular invasion (LVI), and perineural invasion (PeNI) have been identified as indicators of poor prognosis for many malignancies. We aimed to evaluate the relationship between PNI and LVI/PeNI, their prognostic significance, and their effect on overall survival in gastric cancer patients who underwent curative gastrectomy. A cutoff value of 39.8 was taken for the PNI, and PNI < 39.8 was defined as moderate to severe malnutrition. Patients were grouped as PNI-low (PNI < 39.8) and PNI-high (PNI ≥ 39.8). Paraffin-embedded tissue sections of surgical specimens were used to evaluate PeNI as defined by previously reported criteria. The study included 270 patients with ages ranging from 23 to 90 years. The mean PNI was calculated as 39.8 ± 6.35. PeNI was detected in 232 patients (85.93%), and LVI was identified in 248 patients (91.85%). It was observed that the PNI value of patients with an expired status in the PNI < 39.8 group was lower compared to those who survived, and in patients with PNI > 39.8, those without PeNI had better survival. The presence of PeNI in patients with PNI > 39.8 increased the mortality risk by 2.088 units, while in patients with PNI > 39.8, it was found that those without LVI had better survival, and the presence of LVI increased the mortality risk by 3.171 units. Mortality developed in 166 patients (61.48%) during the five-year follow-up period. The five-year overall survival was found to be 31.02 ± 21.73 months. In patients with gastric cancer, the PNI, LVI, and PeNI are independent prognostic factors for overall survival in postoperative patients. A low PNI score is an inherently poor prognostic factor. In patients with a high PNI score, the presence of positive LVI and PeNI negatively impacts survival. We found that in patients with a low PNI, the rates of PeNI and LVI are higher compared to those with a high PNI, and this significantly affects mortality.

MedicineVol. 103(42)
Istanbul University-Cerrahpaşa (TR), Istanbul University (TR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes
1.26
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.